Delay plugin with random delay time

Discussion in 'alt.steinberg.cubase' started by Jos Geluk, Jan 22, 2010.

  1. Jos Geluk Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Hi,

    Does anyone know of a audio delay plugin with a delay time that can be
    set to "variable and random"? All I have is delays with a fixed delay
    setting. I want to make it sound like someone has tried to sing along
    with themselves. I guess that would vary the delay time between -100 and
    +100 ms.

    Any suggestion appreciated.

    Jos.

    --
    Ardis Park Music
    www.ardispark.nl
      • Advertising
  2. Laurence Payne Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:23:13 +0100, Jos Geluk <>
    wrote:

    >Hi,
    >
    >Does anyone know of a audio delay plugin with a delay time that can be
    >set to "variable and random"? All I have is delays with a fixed delay
    >setting. I want to make it sound like someone has tried to sing along
    >with themselves. I guess that would vary the delay time between -100 and
    >+100 ms.
    >
    >Any suggestion appreciated.
    >


    Unless you were looking for random phase effects, the new delay time
    would need to be triggered at the start of each note and then remain
    constant throughout the note. And I'm afraid "random wrongness"
    doesn't equate to "human feel". The best way to do this remains the
    old way - record the singer twice.

    CubaseFAQ page: http://www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm
  3. Hueyduck Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Jos Geluk a écrit :
    > Hi,
    >
    > Does anyone know of a audio delay plugin with a delay time that can be
    > set to "variable and random"? All I have is delays with a fixed delay
    > setting. I want to make it sound like someone has tried to sing along
    > with themselves. I guess that would vary the delay time between -100 and
    > +100 ms.
    >
    > Any suggestion appreciated.


    Laurence is right when saying that the best (the cheapest too) way is to
    sing twice :)
    But I can tell you that Melodyne does what you want very well.
    There is a function that introduces random modification of pitch and/or
    placement of the notes that are sung.

    It produces something that cannot be told from a second take, really.

    As melodyne seems to function like the pitsh correction fucntion of
    cubase 5, have you looked in this direction (eg a derivative use of the
    pitsch correction of cubase 5). I cannot help you with this last
    suggestion since I haven't bothered installing cubase 5 yet.

    Huey
  4. Laurence Payne Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:17:22 +0100, Hueyduck <>
    wrote:

    >Laurence is right when saying that the best (the cheapest too) way is to
    >sing twice :)
    >But I can tell you that Melodyne does what you want very well.
    >There is a function that introduces random modification of pitch and/or
    >placement of the notes that are sung.
    >
    >It produces something that cannot be told from a second take, really.
    >
    >As melodyne seems to function like the pitsh correction fucntion of
    >cubase 5, have you looked in this direction (eg a derivative use of the
    >pitsch correction of cubase 5). I cannot help you with this last
    >suggestion since I haven't bothered installing cubase 5 yet.


    Fair enough. But be careful you don't end up with an emulation of a
    singer double-tracking BADLY :)

    CubaseFAQ page: http://www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm
      • Advertising
  5. Jos Geluk Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Op 22-1-2010 13:29, Laurence Payne schreef:
    > On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:17:22 +0100, Hueyduck<>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> Laurence is right when saying that the best (the cheapest too) way is to
    >> sing twice :)
    >> But I can tell you that Melodyne does what you want very well.
    >> There is a function that introduces random modification of pitch and/or
    >> placement of the notes that are sung.
    >>
    >> It produces something that cannot be told from a second take, really.
    >>
    >> As melodyne seems to function like the pitsh correction fucntion of
    >> cubase 5, have you looked in this direction (eg a derivative use of the
    >> pitsch correction of cubase 5). I cannot help you with this last
    >> suggestion since I haven't bothered installing cubase 5 yet.

    >
    > Fair enough. But be careful you don't end up with an emulation of a
    > singer double-tracking BADLY :)


    Thank you both! And my apologies: I should have made clear that a
    certain artificiality is what I'm after, not "human feel" or something
    that could be done better by singing twice. I have been thinking of
    investing in Melodyne anyway, and not because my singers can't keep a
    tune :)


    Have a nice weekend,

    Jos.


    --
    Ardis Park Music
    www.ardispark.nl
  6. XODDI Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    "Laurence Payne" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:23:13 +0100, Jos Geluk <>
    > wrote:
    >
    >>Hi,
    >>
    >>Does anyone know of a audio delay plugin with a delay time that can be
    >>set to "variable and random"? All I have is delays with a fixed delay
    >>setting. I want to make it sound like someone has tried to sing along
    >>with themselves. I guess that would vary the delay time between -100 and
    >>+100 ms.
    >>
    >>Any suggestion appreciated.
    >>

    >
    > Unless you were looking for random phase effects, the new delay time
    > would need to be triggered at the start of each note and then remain
    > constant throughout the note. And I'm afraid "random wrongness"
    > doesn't equate to "human feel". The best way to do this remains the
    > old way - record the singer twice.


    There is a free plug-in called adt by vacuumsound that may be along those
    lines:
    http://www.kvraudio.com/get/3549.html

    I've used it a couple times, it's stable in CubStud4, but I don't track
    vocals.

    I have played with a design for a delay in which the delay time and the
    feedback levels were modulated by a random LFO.

    Boy, if you ever want things to get real out-of-control real fast, that's a
    delay for you.
      • Advertising

Share This Page