Hi: I know I've brought this subject up before -- and in other groups -- but I just can't get over it. I apologize big-time to those who might be annoyed. I hate PCI sound cards and their sick sample playback MIDI synth. I request that readers please read this message from began to end until they fully understand it. I hate sick sample playback MIDI synths. I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non- emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there. FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its all kakaa-like emulation. SB16 PCI has the disadvantages of SB16 ISA [e.g. limitation to 16-bit resolution] without the advantages [e.g. *real* FM synthesis]. All SB16 PCIs should be burned in oxyacetylene flames. AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'. I don't really like it though, it is emulation. The Avance sound card has 'Avance FM synth', but its also a real stinker as it isn't a real synth. The evil PCI loves to inflict pain on other types of slot -- ISA being the unfortunate victim. PCI cards don't contain real FM synth. Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only 'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human diarrhea kakaa foam. I don't understand why a PCI card cannot contain a real FM synth like Creative Music Synth [220]. Is there a technical barrier to this? I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness, warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous -- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation. Creative Music Synth [220] = SB16 ISA's FM synth = my favorite MIDI synth. I don't care for other MIDI synths. Creative Music Synth [220] is: 1. Real and 2. Digital and 3. Hardware and 4. Real-time All other FM synths are okay. Wavetables are also good. But I don't care for them. Here are my ratings for *soundcard* MIDI synths in the order from best to worst: 1. Creative Music Synth [220] 2. All digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220] 3. Wavetables, non-FM digital synths, analog [non-digital] synths 4. Sample playback synths Sample playback synths are the worst. Sample playback synths STEEEENKS!!!! Sample playback MIDI synths are the worst audio equipment ever. They are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy, irritating, farty, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying. I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent. The only thing about Creative Technology that I like is their Creative Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they are a piece of kakaa. Creative Technology is one f--king piece of crap that provides sh--ty customer service. Their tech support is so limited. Creative Technology used to be such a great company 13 years ago. Now there are nothing but stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-humans. I've asked them about Creative Music Synth [220] -- through a variety of means, including but not limited to phone, fax, and their online tech support -- only to be totally-ignored. I asked them about this for the past 5 years. Never got a decent answer. In addition, most of their online tech support is pre-written garbage. Creative Technology also uses such f--ked up sickening disgusting sample playback synths in their PCI cards. I wish that a gang of persons who support Creative Music Synth [220] would attack Creative Technology and force them to make hardware versions of Creative Music Synth [220] -- in PCI cards that are compatible with PCI slots and Windows XP -- upgraded from 16-bit to 32- bit and from 44.1 KHz to 192 KHz. And from there, keep on upgrading! When XP and PCI are obsolete then Creative Technology should be forced to make even newer hardware versions of CMS220 -- with even wider bit-resolutions and higher sample-rates -- that are compatible with the newer hardwares and softwares that will exist in that future time. If Creative Technology refuses, I hope the CMS220-advocating gang ties up the people who make up that company and torturously force them to repeatedly listen to sample playback MIDI synths and emulation until those Creative personnel are annoyed with burning headaches and are deathly desperate for an escape. Only then will the people of Creative Technology do the right thing -- make upgraded versions of Creative Music Synth [220]. A rich spoiled-rotten company like Creative deserves to be heinously hijacked and forced to do their duties. The least Creative Technology Ltd could do is put a *real* 32-bit, 192 kHz, version of Creative Music Synth [220]. But noooooooooooooooooooooo! They are too f--king lazy. Its not just Creative Technology that's responsible. Its also the fault of self-destructive customers who don't mind paying $$$$$$$$$$$$ $ $$$$$$ for those crappy sample playback synths. F--k those customers as well. Masochistic perverts! I don't care if those customers destroy themselves. Though, I sure as f--k don't want them destroying me! Such customers should eat their own stinky diarrhea kakaa foam. If you feed a scum, then you're just as filthy as that scum and I sincerely hope you suffer just as much. I feel like torching the chips of sample playback synths with oxyacetylene flames to distort their audio output. Anyone who respectfully uses any sample playback MIDI synth needs to be put in a mental hospital ASAP for his/her own good as he is a danger to him/herself. Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth. Its those sample playback synths that are crap. Sadly most MIDI magazines advertise the kakaa-stinky sample playback as a good thing often referring to them as 'wavetables'. These sick marketers call sample playback synthesis 'realistic sounding'. Sample playbacks synths are nothing more than the sound of a stinky fart emitted from a human colon. I've been looking hard for true FM synths. No luck. Most PCI cards have OPL emulation. I hate FM emulation. FM emulation -- much like any sample playback synthesis -- is to the ear what human kakaa is to the nose. I want *real* FM synthesis not some stinky trashy out-of-a-human- behind emulation. Those stinky-f==king marketers who refer to sample playback synthesis as 'wavetables' deserve to be thrown into the sewer and made to eat their own crap. There is a world of different between sample playback synthesis and wavetable synthesis. If you still believe the marketer-induced myth that wavetable synthesis and sample playback synthesis are the same thing, then please educate yourself with the hardcore scientific facts presented on the following link: http://www.musicdsp.org/files/Wavetable-101.pdf Wavetable synthesis is so much better than any kakaa-spitting sample playback synth but not nearly as heavenly as *true* FM synthesis. Of all the *true* FM synths, Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite. If a synth is *not*: 1. *Real* AND 2. *Digital* AND 3. *Real-time* AND 4. *Hardware* then it, STEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEE EEEEEEEEEEENKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!! Here is what I would like to do. I would like to make some replicable electronic nanobots that will search for sample playback MIDI synths in any part of the world and attach to the digital chips of sample playback MIDI synths. These nanobots should contain magnetic receivers that will extract any random environmental magnetic audio signals 2 kHz and 50 kHz [excluding spikes, square-waves, white noise, brown noise, pink noise and bass sounds]. The nanobots then amplify those signals to the point where they would significantly interfere with -- and cause inductive crosstalk in -- the audio signals in the digital electronic chips of the sample playback MIDI synths. This will cause sample playback MIDI synths to be full of annoying -- and perhaps even frightening -- auditory disuptions from environmental magnetic interference. That way all companies will be forced to make *real* synths and the listeners will be forced to adapt to the excellent audio quality of *real* synths. For those who miss their stinky human kakaa foam of sample playback synths, well, f--k them! I try playing Creative Music Synth [220], through my so-called 'karaoke voice canceller' -- which inverts the phase of one stereo channel [right or left] and then combines it the other channel -- which results in anything identical in both the left and right channels being removed. I get a mono of what was different in the left and right channels. When I play Creative Music Synth [220] audio through the voice- canceller, it sounds more treble, sharper, brighter, warmer, andcrisper than when I don't use the voice-canceller. Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Radium
Re: I am digusted with Creative Technology because they no longermake Creative Music Synth [220] Radium wrote: > Hi: SNIP So was there a point to this?
"Radium" <> blatted: >Hi: > >I know I've brought this subject up before -- and in other groups -- >but I just can't get over it. I apologize big-time to those who might >be annoyed. I hate PCI sound cards and their sick sample playback MIDI >synth. > >I request that readers please read this message from began to end >until they fully understand it. > >I hate sick sample playback MIDI synths. > >I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non- >emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there. > >FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample >playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa Thank you for your many fine releases. 1. Read this to the end? You're nuts. 2. FM emulation is not the same as sample playback. 3. Real musos don't use soundcard synths. Have any kind of day you like.
On Jan 27, 8:37 pm, Organ Freak <> wrote: > 2. FM emulation is not the same as sample playback. Um, FM emulation uses software samples of signals that were once generated by an *actual* FM synth > 3. Real musos don't use soundcard synths. Well, WTF aren't there any keyboards/MIDI-boxes that use Creative Music Synth [220]?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
In news: the killer robot "Radium" <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons... > I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non- > emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there. Not me, I yearn for the sound of a Commode-odor 64 SID chip! Almost nothing bleeps as good as a *real* SID chip. Yeah, I know, they have SID emulators, but they totally steenk. -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms
In news: the killer robot Organ Freak <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons... > FM emulation is not the same as sample playback. Have you heard the piano on an OPL chip??? What compares to that? -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms
On Jan 27, 8:59 pm, Glennbo <> wrote: > Not me, I yearn for the sound of a Commode-odor 64 SID chip! Almost > nothing bleeps as good as a *real* SID chip. Yeah, I know, they have SID > emulators, but they totally steenk. Hey, check out the following link: http://forums.creative.com/creativelabs/tracker?user.id=8862 On the Creative website I am known as "CMS220" In the above link, is where I take revenge against the following: 1. Creative Technology for no longer making or upgrading Creative Music Synth [220] 2. Customers who like -- or don't mind -- sample playback MIDI synths 3. Customers who dislike -- or don't care for -- Creative Music Synth [220]
"Radium" <> wrote in message news:... > > > On Jan 27, 8:59 pm, Glennbo <> wrote: >> Not me, I yearn for the sound of a Commode-odor 64 SID chip! Almost >> nothing bleeps as good as a *real* SID chip. Yeah, I know, they have SID I don't speak for others here, but I would guess that > 90 % of pros here would tell you that Creative products are horrible in pro-sound apps. I learned to cease using them 8 years ago, and still wonder that periodically someone will pop-up here and complain that their Creative Krap won't work on modern, PRO systems. Basically, were I answering you, I would suggest you throw out Creative Krap in the trash. ..... but since I am not answering you, i'll with-hold my comments. Bob
On Jan 27, 11:38 pm, "BlackHawke" <> wrote: > "Radium" <> wrote in messagenews:... > > > > > On Jan 27, 8:59 pm, Glennbo <> wrote: > >> Not me, I yearn for the sound of a Commode-odor 64 SID chip! Almost > >> nothing bleeps as good as a *real* SID chip. Yeah, I know, they have SIDI don't speak for others here, but I would guess that > 90 % of pros here > would tell you that Creative products are horrible in pro-sound apps. > I learned to cease using them 8 years ago, and still wonder that > periodically someone will pop-up here and complain that their Creative Krap > won't work on modern, PRO systems. > > Basically, were I answering you, I would suggest you throw out Creative Krap > in the trash. > > .... but since I am not answering you, i'll with-hold my comments. > > Bob As I said, the only positive thing about Creative Technology Ltd is their Creative Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they stink like human kakaa.
"Radium" <> wrote in message news:... > As I said, the only positive thing about Creative Technology Ltd is > their Creative Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they stink like > human kakaa. > Yeah well, my grandfather's still pissed at Ford for not bringing back the Model T. But, you can't always get what you want, no matter how hard you stomp your feet. *real* synthesis? Isn't that an oxymoron?
In news: the killer robot "Radium" <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons... >> Not me, I yearn for the sound of a Commode-odor 64 SID chip! Almost >> nothing bleeps as good as a *real* SID chip. Yeah, I know, they have >> SID emulators, but they totally steenk. > > Hey, check out the following link: > > http://forums.creative.com/creativelabs/tracker?user.id=8862 > > On the Creative website I am known as "CMS220" > > In the above link, is where I take revenge against the following: > > 1. Creative Technology for no longer making or upgrading Creative > Music Synth [220] > > 2. Customers who like -- or don't mind -- sample playback MIDI synths > > 3. Customers who dislike -- or don't care for -- Creative Music Synth > [220] That is so kewl! If I were you, I'd buy a first generation Pentium and motherboard with some ISA slots. Then on Ebay I'd look for a Soundblaster Pro (8-bit wavetable + OPL FM). Get a midi interface for the joystick port, and then use it as the killer retro FM boxen from Hell! -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms
On 27 Jan 2007, kitekrazy <> wrote in cakewalk.audio: > So was there a point to this? The only point is that he's spamming this same delusional rant to a bunch of different newsgroups. Think of him as the internet equivilent of the lady who wanders through the supermarket talking to the the paper products.
On 27 Jan 2007 19:43:08 -0800, "Radium" <> wrote: >Hi: > >I know I've brought this subject up before -- and in other groups -- >but I just can't get over it. I apologize big-time to those who might >be annoyed. I hate PCI sound cards and their sick sample playback MIDI >synth. > >I request that readers please read this message from began to end >until they fully understand it. > >I hate sick sample playback MIDI synths. > >I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non- >emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there. > >FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample >playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa > >SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its >all kakaa-like emulation. > >SB16 PCI has the disadvantages of SB16 ISA [e.g. limitation to 16-bit >resolution] without the advantages [e.g. *real* FM synthesis]. All >SB16 PCIs should be burned in oxyacetylene flames. > >AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'. I >don't really like it though, it is emulation. The Avance sound card >has 'Avance FM synth', but its also a real stinker as it isn't a real >synth. The evil PCI loves to inflict pain on other types of slot -- >ISA being the unfortunate victim. PCI cards don't contain real FM >synth. > >Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only >'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human >diarrhea kakaa foam. I don't understand why a PCI card cannot contain >a real FM synth like Creative Music Synth [220]. Is there a technical >barrier to this? > >I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness, >warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous >-- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation. > >Creative Music Synth [220] = SB16 ISA's FM synth = my favorite MIDI >synth. > >I don't care for other MIDI synths. > >Creative Music Synth [220] is: > >1. Real > >and > >2. Digital > >and > >3. Hardware > >and > >4. Real-time > >All other FM synths are okay. Wavetables are also good. But I don't >care for them. > >Here are my ratings for *soundcard* MIDI synths in the order from best >to worst: > >1. Creative Music Synth [220] >2. All digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth >[220] >3. Wavetables, non-FM digital synths, analog [non-digital] synths >4. Sample playback synths > >Sample playback synths are the worst. > >Sample playback synths STEEEENKS!!!! > >Sample playback MIDI synths are the worst audio equipment ever. They >are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy, irritating, farty, hissy, >terrifying, disgusting, and annoying. > >I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so >warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent. > >The only thing about Creative Technology that I like is their Creative >Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they are a piece of kakaa. > >Creative Technology is one f--king piece of crap that provides sh--ty >customer service. Their tech support is so limited. > >Creative Technology used to be such a great company 13 years ago. Now >there are nothing but stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-humans. > >I've asked them about Creative Music Synth [220] -- through a variety >of means, including but not limited to phone, fax, and their online >tech support -- only to be totally-ignored. I asked them about this >for the past 5 years. Never got a decent answer. In addition, most of >their online tech support is pre-written garbage. > >Creative Technology also uses such f--ked up sickening disgusting >sample playback synths in their PCI cards. > >I wish that a gang of persons who support Creative Music Synth [220] >would attack Creative Technology and force them to make hardware >versions of Creative Music Synth [220] -- in PCI cards that are >compatible with PCI slots and Windows XP -- upgraded from 16-bit to >32- bit and from 44.1 KHz to 192 KHz. And from there, keep on >upgrading! When XP and PCI are obsolete then Creative Technology >should be forced to make even newer hardware versions of CMS220 -- >with even wider bit-resolutions and higher sample-rates -- that are >compatible with the newer hardwares and softwares that will exist in >that future time. > >If Creative Technology refuses, I hope the CMS220-advocating gang ties >up the people who make up that company and torturously force them to >repeatedly listen to sample playback MIDI synths and emulation until >those Creative personnel are annoyed with burning headaches and are >deathly desperate for an escape. Only then will the people of Creative >Technology do the right thing -- make upgraded versions of Creative >Music Synth [220]. > >A rich spoiled-rotten company like Creative deserves to be heinously >hijacked and forced to do their duties. > >The least Creative Technology Ltd could do is put a *real* 32-bit, 192 >kHz, version of Creative Music Synth [220]. But >noooooooooooooooooooooo! They are too f--king lazy. > >Its not just Creative Technology that's responsible. Its also the >fault of self-destructive customers who don't mind paying $$$$$$$$$$$$ >$ $$$$$$ for those crappy sample playback synths. F--k those customers >as well. Masochistic perverts! I don't care if those customers destroy >themselves. Though, I sure as f--k don't want them destroying me! Such >customers should eat their own stinky diarrhea kakaa foam. If you feed >a scum, then you're just as filthy as that scum and I sincerely hope >you suffer just as much. > >I feel like torching the chips of sample playback synths with >oxyacetylene flames to distort their audio output. > >Anyone who respectfully uses any sample playback MIDI synth needs to >be put in a mental hospital ASAP for his/her own good as he is a >danger to him/herself. > >Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth. > >Its those sample playback synths that are crap. > >Sadly most MIDI magazines advertise the kakaa-stinky sample playback >as a good thing often referring to them as 'wavetables'. These sick >marketers call sample playback synthesis 'realistic sounding'. > >Sample playbacks synths are nothing more than the sound of a stinky >fart emitted from a human colon. > >I've been looking hard for true FM synths. No luck. Most PCI cards >have OPL emulation. I hate FM emulation. FM emulation -- much like any >sample playback synthesis -- is to the ear what human kakaa is to the >nose. > >I want *real* FM synthesis not some stinky trashy out-of-a-human- >behind emulation. > >Those stinky-f==king marketers who refer to sample playback synthesis >as 'wavetables' deserve to be thrown into the sewer and made to eat >their own crap. > >There is a world of different between sample playback synthesis and >wavetable synthesis. > >If you still believe the marketer-induced myth that wavetable >synthesis and sample playback synthesis are the same thing, then >please educate yourself with the hardcore scientific facts presented >on the following link: > >http://www.musicdsp.org/files/Wavetable-101.pdf > >Wavetable synthesis is so much better than any kakaa-spitting sample >playback synth but not nearly as heavenly as *true* FM synthesis. Of >all the *true* FM synths, Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite. > >If a synth is *not*: > >1. *Real* > >AND > >2. *Digital* > >AND > >3. *Real-time* > >AND > >4. *Hardware* > >then it, >STEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE >EEEE >EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE >EEEE >EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE >EEEE >EEEEEEEEEEENKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >!!!!!!!!! > >Here is what I would like to do. I would like to make some replicable >electronic nanobots that will search for sample playback MIDI synths >in any part of the world and attach to the digital chips of sample >playback MIDI synths. These nanobots should contain magnetic receivers >that will extract any random environmental magnetic audio signals 2 >kHz and 50 kHz [excluding spikes, square-waves, white noise, brown >noise, pink noise and bass sounds]. The nanobots then amplify those >signals to the point where they would significantly interfere with -- >and cause inductive crosstalk in -- the audio signals in the digital >electronic chips of the sample playback MIDI synths. This will cause >sample playback MIDI synths to be full of annoying -- and perhaps even >frightening -- auditory disuptions from environmental magnetic >interference. > >That way all companies will be forced to make *real* synths and the >listeners will be forced to adapt to the excellent audio quality of >*real* synths. For those who miss their stinky human kakaa foam of >sample playback synths, well, f--k them! > >I try playing Creative Music Synth [220], through my so-called >'karaoke voice canceller' -- which inverts the phase of one stereo >channel [right or left] and then combines it the other channel -- >which results in anything identical in both the left and right >channels being removed. I get a mono of what was different in the left >and right channels. > >When I play Creative Music Synth [220] audio through the voice- >canceller, it sounds more treble, sharper, brighter, warmer, >andcrisper than when I don't use the voice-canceller. > >Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated. > > >Thanks, > >Radium Dont beat around the bush, tell us what you really think -- Invisible Friend
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:45:39 -0600, Nil <> wrote: >On 27 Jan 2007, kitekrazy <> wrote in >cakewalk.audio: > >> So was there a point to this? > >The only point is that he's spamming this same delusional rant to a >bunch of different newsgroups. Think of him as the internet equivilent >of the lady who wanders through the supermarket talking to the the >paper products. Oy! That's my mum you're talking about! ) -- Invisible Friend
"kitekrazy" <> wrote in message news:hAVuh.76377$... > Radium wrote: >> Hi: > > SNIP > > So was there a point to this? No. He posts this exact diatribe regularly on rec.music.makers.synth. I think it's a joke. At least I hope it is. I didn't say it was funny...
