Looks like the new Apple Logic Studio does it again!

Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to

http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/


Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!

Impressive...

On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:22:53 -0700, Guy <>
wrote:

>Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to
>
>http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>
>
>Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>
>Impressive...

You reckon? So I ditch my pc, laptop and half my plug-ins..go Mac and
all will be well? Nah..I'm staying put...Cubase does I want it to. It
aint perfect but better the devil I know.............LL

There's nothing on that page which Cubase 5 either doesn't already do, or
you can't do with another application. Stop being an Apple hack and go make
some music. Last I checked the sequencer package you use doesn't help you
make less crappy music.

-Ben



"Guy" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to
>
> http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>
>
> Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>
> Impressive...

On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:22:53 -0700, Guy <>
wrote:

>Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to
>
>http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>
>
>Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>
>Impressive...


Yeah, impressive crashes and incompatibilities, go over to the Apple
support page and witness the carnage.

Most people over there are complaining what a weak update it is and
that it doesn't have the kind of pitch correction Cubase does.

Each program has a few minor operations the other cannot do but the
big one is the melodyne style pitch correction that Cubase has and
Logic doesn't. There's even a topic on the Apple board lauding Cubase.

Ap

"Guy" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to
>
> http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>
>
> Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>
> Impressive...
>

And how are you this year, troll-boi?

oldtroll is OLD.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:35:27 +0100, "Ben Hanson"
<> wrote:

>There's nothing on that page which Cubase 5 either doesn't already do,


Cubase 5? You're joking right?

Isn't that the version that crackers haven't bothered to crack because
it's still so buggy?

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:20:24 GMT, (Aphelion)
wrote:

>On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:22:53 -0700, Guy <>
>wrote:
>
>>Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to
>>
>>http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>>
>>
>>Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>>
>>Impressive...
>
>
>Yeah, impressive crashes and incompatibilities, go over to the Apple
>support page and witness the carnage.
>

Uh... go to the Cubase forums and see all the people STILL too afraid
to upgrade to Cubase 5.


>Most people over there are complaining what a weak update it is and
>that it doesn't have the kind of pitch correction Cubase does.
>
>Each program has a few minor operations the other cannot do but the
>big one is the melodyne style pitch correction that Cubase has and
>Logic doesn't. There's even a topic on the Apple board lauding Cubase.
>
>Ap


Uh... the audio operations and timing editing in Logic is a major step
for sequencing and not found in Cucrash.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:34:09 +0100, lancelightning <> wrote:

>On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:22:53 -0700, Guy <>
>wrote:
>
>>Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to
>>
>>http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>>
>>
>>Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>>
>>Impressive...
>
>You reckon? So I ditch my pc, laptop and half my plug-ins..go Mac and
>all will be well? Nah..I'm staying put...Cubase does I want it to. It
>aint perfect but better the devil I know.............LL


LOL at dongle boy.

How's your dongle doing?

Logic - no dongle needed... at least Apple doesn't treat their
customers like thieves.

Too buggy? No. Go read the NFO which came with the hacked version of SX3
from a few years ago and the crackers will tell you themselves why they
haven't bothered cracking any version since (here's a hint: the Synchrosoft
integration and encryption makes it not worth the effort).

Nice attempt at setting up a strawman to distract attention from my original
response though...to be expected I guess since it proves that you're not a
real musician but a fanboy Apple hack.

While you're at it, post the awesome music you made with Logic that's
impossible to make with any other sequencer. I can't wait to hear how using
Mac OS and Logic make shite songwriters and musicians magically awesome.

-Ben


"Guy" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:35:27 +0100, "Ben Hanson"
> <> wrote:
>
>>There's nothing on that page which Cubase 5 either doesn't already do,
>
>
> Cubase 5? You're joking right?
>
> Isn't that the version that crackers haven't bothered to crack because
> it's still so buggy?

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:24:21 -0700, Guy <>
wrote:

>
>Uh... go to the Cubase forums and see all the people STILL too afraid
>to upgrade to Cubase 5.

Cubase 5 is solid on PC, but I can see it being unstable (like Logic 9
is) on the bloated OS that is Leopard... go check the Apple forum, the
last OSX update is breaking parts of Logic. (and I generally like
Logic, I've used it since version 2.xx).

>Uh... the audio operations and timing editing in Logic is a major step
>for sequencing and not found in Cucrash.

No, they could even be done in earlier versions of Cubase, I use both
programs on a regular basis.

Ap

Hey..What's the cracked SX3 got to do with anything? Sod the
crackers...we're at Cubase 5 now which most of us here think is pretty
damn good. This a Cubase forum is it not?..WTF are you doing here
anyway apart from winding people up? There's a lot of very talented
and experienced musicians here. We don't need some spotty-faced
jack-ass ranting on about something that has nothing to do with the
group. Ha ha...I'm enjoying this....LL

On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:35:42 +0100, "Ben Hanson"
<> wrote:

>Too buggy? No. Go read the NFO which came with the hacked version of SX3
>from a few years ago and the crackers will tell you themselves why they
>haven't bothered cracking any version since (here's a hint: the Synchrosoft
>integration and encryption makes it not worth the effort).
>
>Nice attempt at setting up a strawman to distract attention from my original
>response though...to be expected I guess since it proves that you're not a
>real musician but a fanboy Apple hack.
>
>While you're at it, post the awesome music you made with Logic that's
>impossible to make with any other sequencer. I can't wait to hear how using
>Mac OS and Logic make shite songwriters and musicians magically awesome.
>
>-Ben
>
>
>"Guy" <> wrote in message
>news:...
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:35:27 +0100, "Ben Hanson"
>> <> wrote:
>>
>>>There's nothing on that page which Cubase 5 either doesn't already do,
>>
>>
>> Cubase 5? You're joking right?
>>
>> Isn't that the version that crackers haven't bothered to crack because
>> it's still so buggy?
>

I accidentally aimed my rant at the wrong poster but you get the idea
!! LL

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:52:42 +0100, lancelightning <> wrote:

>Hey..What's the cracked SX3 got to do with anything? Sod the
>crackers...we're at Cubase 5 now which most of us here think is pretty
>damn good. This a Cubase forum is it not?..WTF are you doing here
>anyway apart from winding people up? There's a lot of very talented
>and experienced musicians here. We don't need some spotty-faced
>jack-ass ranting on about something that has nothing to do with the
>group. Ha ha...I'm enjoying this....LL
>
>On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:35:42 +0100, "Ben Hanson"
><> wrote:
>
>>Too buggy? No. Go read the NFO which came with the hacked version of SX3
>>from a few years ago and the crackers will tell you themselves why they
>>haven't bothered cracking any version since (here's a hint: the Synchrosoft
>>integration and encryption makes it not worth the effort).
>>
>>Nice attempt at setting up a strawman to distract attention from my original
>>response though...to be expected I guess since it proves that you're not a
>>real musician but a fanboy Apple hack.
>>
>>While you're at it, post the awesome music you made with Logic that's
>>impossible to make with any other sequencer. I can't wait to hear how using
>>Mac OS and Logic make shite songwriters and musicians magically awesome.
>>
>>-Ben
>>
>>
>>"Guy" <> wrote in message
>>news:...
>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:35:27 +0100, "Ben Hanson"
>>> <> wrote:
>>>
>>>>There's nothing on that page which Cubase 5 either doesn't already do,
>>>
>>>
>>> Cubase 5? You're joking right?
>>>
>>> Isn't that the version that crackers haven't bothered to crack because
>>> it's still so buggy?
>>

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:52:42 +0100, lancelightning <> wrote:

>jack-ass ranting on about something that has nothing to do with the
>group. Ha ha...I'm enjoying this....LL


Yeah man, I feel 10 years younger... like 50!

haha.....

I've been having to use Logic (which used to be a great program) for
some compatibility projects which means I have to deal with Mac folks.

My God! they are a snotty, holier than thou group.
There are a few knowledgeable nice folks there but they are far
outnumbered by the Mac fanboyz, each one a genius but somehow can't
figure out the simplest things.

The current fix for most Macs is a complete reinstall of the OS, my
how things have changed.


Ap

p.s.
Speaking of My God, there are some great Jethro Tull videos on
youtube. I had forgotten what a great band they were, saw them live 3
times back in the day, excellent live shows.

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:46:13 GMT, (Aphelion)
wrote:

>The current fix for most Macs is a complete reinstall of the OS, my
>how things have changed.

Am I right in saying this can be done independently of re-installing
all the applications? If so, it does seem the efficient quick-fix.

CubaseFAQ page: http://www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm

On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:46:06 GMT, (Aphelion)
wrote:

>On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:24:21 -0700, Guy <>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Uh... go to the Cubase forums and see all the people STILL too afraid
>>to upgrade to Cubase 5.
>
>Cubase 5 is solid on PC, but I can see it being unstable (like Logic 9
>is) on the bloated OS that is Leopard... go check the Apple forum, the
>last OSX update is breaking parts of Logic. (and I generally like
>Logic, I've used it since version 2.xx).
>
>>Uh... the audio operations and timing editing in Logic is a major step
>>for sequencing and not found in Cucrash.
>
>No, they could even be done in earlier versions of Cubase, I use both
>programs on a regular basis.
>
>Ap
>


Bullshit. You can't move audio the way you can in Logic now. Go back
and read up some more. You can eidt audio the way you do midi!
Incredible!

http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/logicpro/

Flex Time is a collection of tools that allows you to quickly
manipulate the timing and tempo of your recording for the tightest
performance possible. Use the new Flex Tool to easily move the
individual beats on a waveform — forget all that tedious splicing and
editing. Flex Time combines beat slicing and elastic audio techniques
into a single workflow. And you no longer have to master different
techniques to correct drum, vocal, guitar, or any other kind of
tracks. Best of all, your edits are always rendered in real time, even
when you’re using the highest-quality setting.

Audio Quantize lets you fix the timing of an entire performance in one
step, aligning notes and beats to a musical grid. Want to match your
bass line to the feel of your drums? You can transfer the rhythmic
feel of one track to another by creating a Groove template from the
source track and applying it as a grid.

On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:46:13 GMT, (Aphelion)
wrote:

>On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:52:42 +0100, lancelightning <> wrote:
>
>>jack-ass ranting on about something that has nothing to do with the
>>group. Ha ha...I'm enjoying this....LL
>
>
>Yeah man, I feel 10 years younger... like 50!
>
>haha.....
>
>I've been having to use Logic (which used to be a great program) for
>some compatibility projects which means I have to deal with Mac folks.
>
>My God! they are a snotty, holier than thou group.
>There are a few knowledgeable nice folks there but they are far
>outnumbered by the Mac fanboyz, each one a genius but somehow can't
>figure out the simplest things.


Perhaps you need to take a look in the mirror at yourself. You seem
very arrogant and no wonder people are rude to you. Apple OSX is the
best platform with the lowest latecy for music these days. Windows
even runs FASTER on a MAC! No wonder you think Apple users are better
than you...




>
>The current fix for most Macs is a complete reinstall of the OS, my
>how things have changed.

Bullcrap. You're still stuck in the 90's. Again, read the Cubase
forums for all the problems. People are still wishing for them to fix
bugs in sx2! Cubase releases fancy updates but things continue to
break. Apple makes the OS and the Sequencer - they know all the
secrets. Cubase does not know the Windows secrets and has to rely on
Asio causing more latency and problems.

Sorry, you lose..........

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:26:00 -0700, Guy <>
wrote:

>On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:34:09 +0100, lancelightning <> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:22:53 -0700, Guy <>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to
>>>
>>>http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>>>
>>>
>>>Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>>>
>>>Impressive...
>>
>>You reckon? So I ditch my pc, laptop and half my plug-ins..go Mac and
>>all will be well? Nah..I'm staying put...Cubase does I want it to. It
>>aint perfect but better the devil I know.............LL
>
>
>LOL at dongle boy.
>
>How's your dongle doing?
>
>Logic - no dongle needed... at least Apple doesn't treat their
>customers like thieves.


Again - NO DONGLE HERE! Another protection layer that slows the music
process.

LOL

I look at all these bad dongle posts and laugh. No such problem here.

Guy wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:34:09 +0100, lancelightning <> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:22:53 -0700, Guy <>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to
>>>
>>> http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>>>
>>>
>>> Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>>>
>>> Impressive...
>>
>> You reckon? So I ditch my pc, laptop and half my plug-ins..go Mac and
>> all will be well? Nah..I'm staying put...Cubase does I want it to. It
>> aint perfect but better the devil I know.............LL
>
>
> LOL at dongle boy.
>
> How's your dongle doing?
>
> Logic - no dongle needed... at least Apple doesn't treat their
> customers like thieves.

Oh, there´s no dongle needed for UNlogic? I´m gonna have to tell that to my
friend, who went back home from his project studio several times, ´cause he
forgot his dongle for Logic Pro 7. If he just had known, his software also
runs withOUT the dongle, we might have saved a few hours! Unfortunately his
ibook and the Logic7 software also didn´t know, that the Logic version
installed onto it, would run
without the required dongle.
Yeah, Logic 8 (and upwards obviously) doesn´t need a dongle anymore. But
until Logic 7, you were
lost without the dongle... and you can never be sure, that they don´t ever
go back to the dongle "security" somewhen.

So, better stick to the facts, little fanboy and don´t make it sound like
Apple never "treated their customers like thieves", because they did!!!

Don´t get me wrong: I´m definitely not a fan of dongles! ...but I can
understand, that software manufacturers rely on them.


Phil

On Aug 8, 11:22 pm, Guy <> wrote:
> Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to

Could you be more specific - unless you're talking about the groovy
XBOX 360 game interface - is there anything it does that cubase hasn't
been doing since C5?

My breath is baited in anticipation.


>
> http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>
> Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>
> Impressive...

"Phil W" <> wrote in message
news:h6a7fs$pus$...
> Guy wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:34:09 +0100, lancelightning <> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:22:53 -0700, Guy <>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like Cubase has a lot to catch up to
>>>>
>>>> http://www.apple.com/logicstudio/what-is/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Look at all that stuff you can do to the audio now!
>>>>
>>>> Impressive...
>>>
>>> You reckon? So I ditch my pc, laptop and half my plug-ins..go Mac and
>>> all will be well? Nah..I'm staying put...Cubase does I want it to. It
>>> aint perfect but better the devil I know.............LL
>>
>>
>> LOL at dongle boy.
>>
>> How's your dongle doing?
>>
>> Logic - no dongle needed... at least Apple doesn't treat their
>> customers like thieves.
>
> Oh, there´s no dongle needed for UNlogic? I´m gonna have to tell that to
> my
> friend, who went back home from his project studio several times, ´cause
> he
> forgot his dongle for Logic Pro 7. If he just had known, his software also
> runs withOUT the dongle, we might have saved a few hours! Unfortunately
> his
> ibook and the Logic7 software also didn´t know, that the Logic version
> installed onto it, would run
> without the required dongle.
> Yeah, Logic 8 (and upwards obviously) doesn´t need a dongle anymore. But
> until Logic 7, you were
> lost without the dongle... and you can never be sure, that they don´t ever
> go back to the dongle "security" somewhen.
>
> So, better stick to the facts, little fanboy and don´t make it sound like
> Apple never "treated their customers like thieves", because they did!!!
>
> Don´t get me wrong: I´m definitely not a fan of dongles! ...but I can
> understand, that software manufacturers rely on them.
>

This same troll - trhis Guy -runs the same tired Logic crap every year or so
in a.s.c. I've seen at least two iterations.

He has some kind of personality disorder.