http://www.wirelessweek.com/News/20...rizon-Net-Neutrality-Plan-TitleII-Government/ http://www.scsun-news.com/ci_15905162
"Steve_Karl" <> wrote in message news:i5bak1$o2q$-september.org... > > http://www.scsun-news.com/ci_15905162 My own few watts of light on the subject: --- Comments Showing posts 1 - 1 of 1 "For providers, investing in additional capacity is costly, and the flexibility to shape traffic is a prized commodity" Well, yes... I suppose that's true, but commodities are meant to be sold ate prices that reflect both their desirability and the consumer's ability to pay. Parse the phrase "flexibility to shape traffic", and you'll find that it means (precisely) freedom to choose which traffic gets priority over all others. In the for-profit world, that means (precisely) freedom to create as many tiers of transmission priority as providers desire, and to charge for (and profit from) each tier according to its rank in the priority heirarchy. In practice, that's an outright violation of "net neutrality" right from the get-go. GoogIzon speak with forked tongue, methinks.
"Michael" <> wrote in message news:Htbeo.35313$... > GoogIzon speak with forked tongue, methinks. exactly
