I'm still waiting on the sidelines to hear all there is to hear about Sonar 5. I would like to hear any comments or insights from those of you who have it, installed it, and worked sessions with it.
The entity known as PapaNate, posted: > I'm still waiting on the sidelines to hear all there is to hear about > Sonar 5. I would like to hear any comments or insights from those of > you who have it, installed it, and worked sessions with it. Works fine on my machine. See. http://members.cox.net/glennbo/S5.jpg <g> -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo These go to eleven Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
What is the CPU warning about? Paul Glennbo wrote: > The entity known as PapaNate, posted: > > >>I'm still waiting on the sidelines to hear all there is to hear about >>Sonar 5. I would like to hear any comments or insights from those of >>you who have it, installed it, and worked sessions with it. > > > Works fine on my machine. > > See. http://members.cox.net/glennbo/S5.jpg <g> >
The entity known as Paul Layman, posted: >>>I'm still waiting on the sidelines to hear all there is to hear about >>>Sonar 5. I would like to hear any comments or insights from those of >>>you who have it, installed it, and worked sessions with it. >> Works fine on my machine. >> See. http://members.cox.net/glennbo/S5.jpg <g> > What is the CPU warning about? On Sonar4 that song was getting so busy that I had to set the latency slider to 100ms to mix it. When I loaded it up in Sonar5 to grab that screen shot, I had the latency slider set to 10ms, and didn't even notice the CPU warning, because the song was playing back totally fine. And that was with a web browser, email, newsgroups, and a paint program running at the same time. It wasn't until I already had the screen shot up that I noticed the CPU meter. That's when I checked S5 and found that I had done all that with the latency at 10ms. Sonar5 never hiccuped once while all that was going on. -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo These go to eleven Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
"Glennbo" <> wrote in message news:Xns96E656E80D2AABrownShoesDontMakeIt@207.115.17.102... > The entity known as PapaNate, posted: > > > I'm still waiting on the sidelines to hear all there is to hear about > > Sonar 5. I would like to hear any comments or insights from those of > > you who have it, installed it, and worked sessions with it. > > Works fine on my machine. > > See. http://members.cox.net/glennbo/S5.jpg <g> Man, that looks so cool ! ! ! ! Looks a lot better than my 2.2 <g> Larry
I've been running on w2k for about a week. I have only blown up at 2 places. 1) I added some of those ICONs to my tracks, as soon as I saved it POW! Blew up. I did this more than once. I would like to know if you can add track icons and save them, might just be my system???? 2) playing with V-Voice. I played with it for a while then blew up I think going back to Sonar form a V-Vocal edit. It was a small edit of a couple of measures. I have not had time to play with V-Vocal and more to see it it would happen regularly. Generally, S5 seems quite a bit more stable than S4.03. S5 takes a little bit more CPU, but I can play 95% projects without the dropouts/track sounds vanishing etc. I have spent about 6-8 hour per day for this week. It is stable enough in w2k for me to go ahead and move projects to it. I read that if you do not use multiple sample rates in a song, it will still open in S4. It will give you an error, but all the data / tracks / plug setting are just fine. Max Arwood "PapaNate" <> wrote in message news:... > I'm still waiting on the sidelines to hear all there is to hear about > Sonar 5. > I would like to hear any comments or insights from those of you who have > it, installed it, and worked sessions with it. > >
The entity known as polymod, posted: >> Works fine on my machine. >> >> See. http://members.cox.net/glennbo/S5.jpg <g> > > Man, that looks so cool ! ! ! ! > Looks a lot better than my 2.2 <g> There are lots of little tweaks that improve the way it works to. Things like being able to display piano roll right in the track, the old +3db/-3db adjustments have been replaced with a gain gadget that will let you do any size bump or reduction down to 1db steps. Track icons are a real plus. You can now group select on the fly so that changes to a selected group, like in volume or fade times, does the whole group in one whack, and the list goes on and on. Most of the improvements are small things, but there are a *lot* of small improvements that add up to a really BIG improvement over any previous version of Sonar. -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo These go to eleven Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
The entity known as Max Arwood, posted: > I added some of those ICONs to my tracks, as soon as I saved it > POW! Blew up. I did this more than once. I would like to know if > you can add track icons and save them, might just be my system???? I've added track icons to all the projects I'm currently working on and haven't blown up. I'm running S5 on WinXP SP2. -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo These go to eleven Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
Hey, Would the following be correct: Using S4P live with laptop (Dell 1gz, PIII, 384MB ram, Echo Indigo ) , using only soundfonts with midi files, the impact on the CPU should be about the same with SP5? With SP4 files play fine but I would like to go to SP5. Thanks so much Frank L "Glennbo" <> wrote in message news:Xns96E66F2174AE3BrownShoesDontMakeIt@207.115.17.102... > The entity known as Max Arwood, posted: > >> I added some of those ICONs to my tracks, as soon as I saved it >> POW! Blew up. I did this more than once. I would like to know if >> you can add track icons and save them, might just be my system???? > > I've added track icons to all the projects I'm currently working on and > haven't blown up. I'm running S5 on WinXP SP2. > > -- > Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email > ________ ____ > / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ > / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ > / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / > \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Glennbo These go to eleven > Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo > Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits >
The entity known as Frank L, posted: > Would the following be correct: > Using S4P live with laptop (Dell 1gz, PIII, 384MB ram, Echo Indigo ) , > using only soundfonts with midi files, the impact on the CPU should be > about the same with SP5? With SP4 files play fine but I would like to > go to SP5. Thanks so much I'm not seeing an increase in CPU use with the stuff I do. Now, turning on 64 bit double preciscion on the audio engine does make it stress out on my more busy projects. -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo These go to eleven Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
Glennbo wrote: > The entity known as Frank L, posted: > > >>Would the following be correct: >>Using S4P live with laptop (Dell 1gz, PIII, 384MB ram, Echo Indigo ) , >>using only soundfonts with midi files, the impact on the CPU should be >>about the same with SP5? With SP4 files play fine but I would like to >>go to SP5. Thanks so much > > > I'm not seeing an increase in CPU use with the stuff I do. Now, turning on > 64 bit double preciscion on the audio engine does make it stress out on my > more busy projects. > But do they suddenly sound twice as precise? gregor
The entity known as Gregor, posted: >> I'm not seeing an increase in CPU use with the stuff I do. Now, >> turning on 64 bit double preciscion on the audio engine does make it >> stress out on my more busy projects. > But do they suddenly sound twice as precise? No. They sound a bit more airy and open. -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo These go to eleven Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
Glennbo wrote: > The entity known as Gregor, posted: > > >>>I'm not seeing an increase in CPU use with the stuff I do. Now, >>>turning on 64 bit double preciscion on the audio engine does make it >>>stress out on my more busy projects. > > > >>But do they suddenly sound twice as precise? > > > No. They sound a bit more airy and open. > cool, so it actually sounds noticably different?
The entity known as Gregor, posted: >>>>I'm not seeing an increase in CPU use with the stuff I do. Now, >>>>turning on 64 bit double preciscion on the audio engine does make it >>>>stress out on my more busy projects. >>>But do they suddenly sound twice as precise? >> No. They sound a bit more airy and open. > cool, so it actually sounds noticably different? Yes is it noticable, but for the amount of effects I use on the mixes I do, I will need to get a more powerful machine than my P4 2.4Ghz box to use it all the time. It could also be some compatibility issues with my plugs. I've heard that some plugs don't yet behave well with 64 bit. -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo These go to eleven Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
There are bugs popping up that have stopped my purchace. I'll probably wait for 6 or 7. http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=607220 All of the comprehensive info. is at the web forum. Steve "PapaNate" <> wrote in message news:... > I'm still waiting on the sidelines to hear all there is to hear about > Sonar 5. > I would like to hear any comments or insights from those of you who have > it, installed it, and worked sessions with it. > >
The entity known as Steve Karl, posted: > All of the comprehensive info. is at the web forum. You mean "will Sonar 5 work with my Soundblaster"? <G> -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo These go to eleven Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
On 5-Oct-2005, Gregor <> had the unmitigated gall to write: > cool, so it actually sounds noticably different? I hear the difference too. Even though I record at 16 bit 44.1. -- Dave (Mod Bod) http://mixposure.com/dave-modisette/music http://web.tampabay.rr.com/cmodiset/webpage/dave_modisette.htm
In news:zL_0f.134926$ the killer robot "Mod Bod (Dave)" <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons... >> cool, so it actually sounds noticably different? > > I hear the difference too. Even though I record at 16 bit 44.1. I run my system 16 bit 44.1 too. I don't do anything with dynamics so wide that I can't capture it, and keep the noise levels down at the same time. -- Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email ________ ____ / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms
I guess I'll have to upgrade to XP sp2 this year. So I can use all those track icons. Max Arwood "Glennbo" <> wrote in message news:Xns96E66F2174AE3BrownShoesDontMakeIt@207.115.17.102... > The entity known as Max Arwood, posted: > > > I added some of those ICONs to my tracks, as soon as I saved it > > POW! Blew up. I did this more than once. I would like to know if > > you can add track icons and save them, might just be my system???? > > I've added track icons to all the projects I'm currently working on and > haven't blown up. I'm running S5 on WinXP SP2. > > -- > Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email > ________ ____ > / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____ > / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \ > / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ / > \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/ > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Glennbo These go to eleven > Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo > Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/jambits >
