Soundcard-MIDI is *not* obsolete. It just takes an evil form.

Discussion in 'cakewalk.audio' started by Radium, Feb 19, 2007.

  1. Radium Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Hi:

    I know I've brought this extremely-off-topic subject up -- and in
    other groups -- before but I just can't get over it. I apologize
    profusely to those who might be annoyed. I hate soundfonts,
    emulations, and sample playback MIDI synths.

    I request that readers please read this message from began to end
    until they fully understand it.

    There are many people who still care about MIDI but unfortunately,
    these are the sick f--ks who actually like sample playback MIDI
    synths, emulations, and soundfonts.

    No offense, but you are SOOOOO wrong if you think MIDI is obsolete.
    Its just that today's MIDI audio often takes the stinky sample
    playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. I feel like burning
    all sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts along with
    their consumers, and their companies. Sick pieces of stinky thick
    diarrhea human kakaa foam they are. Vaporize all of those involved
    with nuclear-fusion flames!!!!!

    I would like to make some replicable magnetic electronic nanobots that
    will search for sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
    soundfonts in any part of the world and attach to the digital chips of
    sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. These
    nanobots should contain magnetic receivers that will extract any
    random environmental magnetic audio signals from 2 kHz to 50 kHz
    [excluding spikes, square-waves, white noise, brown noise, pink noise
    and bass sounds]. The nanobots then amplify those signals to the point
    where they would significantly interfere with -- and cause inductive
    crosstalk in -- the audio signals in the digital electronic chips of
    the sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. This will
    cause sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts to be
    full of annoying -- and perhaps even frightening -- auditory
    disruptions from environmental magnetic interference**.

    That way all companies will be forced to abandon all their sample
    playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. In addition, all
    listeners will be forced to endure the pollution of sample playback
    MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. Alternatively, all companies
    will be forced to make *real* synths and the listeners will be forced
    to adapt to the excellent audio quality of *real* synths.

    For those who miss their stinky human kakaa foam of soundfonts,
    emulations, and sample playback synths, well, f--k them!

    Voila! No more sample playback MIDI.

    I demand that MIDI either use CMS220, or that MIDI audio not be used
    at all.

    Death to MIDI other than Creative Music Synth [220].

    All sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts must be
    burned badly. That way those involved in MIDI audio will not have much
    choice other than to listen to [or produce]:
    1. Creative Music Synth [220]
    2. Digital FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220]
    3. *Real* wavetables
    4. Other digital synchs [excluding emulations, soundfonts, and sample
    playback]
    5. Analog synths

    OR, the other option for those sample-playback-loving, soundfont-
    supporting, emulation-advocating f--kheads is to totally give up on
    MIDI, get depressed -- due to the absence of sample playback MIDI
    synths, emulations, and soundfonts, and jump off a cliff!!!!

    I'll see to it that revenge is mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    **Note: The magnetic signals that interfere with those digital chips
    should be purely-analog. I just love it when purely-analog magnetic
    signals cause significant disruptions in purely-digital chip-based
    parts of electronic devices that I don't like. Sample playback MIDI
    synths, emulations, and soundfonts are an example of digital
    electronic devices that I don't like so I want to victimize them in
    this manner -- i.e. via magnetic interferences.

    Here is my ratings for soundcard MIDI synths:
    1. Creative Music Synth [220]
    2. Digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220],
    non-FM digital synths [including *real wavetables*; excluding sample
    playbacks, soundfonts, and emulations], and analog synths
    3. Sample playback synths, soundfonts, and emulations of synths.

    Die emulators. Die!

    Die soundfonts. Die! Hope they burn in underworld.

    Try listening to a sample playback MIDI synth -- such as SoundMax's
    MIDI synth -- and compare that to Creative Music Synth [220]. You'll
    *definitely* notice the difference.

    SoundMax MIDI synth audio is to the ear what stinky thick diarrhea
    kakaa foam of humans is to the nose.

    The Crystal soundfont is even worse than SoundMax.

    Crystal soundfont = the stinkiest, thickest diarrhea kakaa foam of a
    human

    Creative Music Synth [220], OTOH, is auditory paradise.

    I hate FM emulation -- or any audio emulation for that matter.

    Emulation = stinky thick diarrhea kakaa foam of humans

    F--k emulation.

    SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its
    all kakaa-like emulation.

    AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'. I
    hate it though because it is emulation.

    Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only
    'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human
    diarrhea kakaa foam.

    I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness,
    warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous
    -- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation.

    Sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts are the worst
    audio equipment ever. They are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy,
    irritating, farty, hissy, terrifying, foamy, disgusting, and annoying.

    I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so
    warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent.

    So yes. There plenty of those kakaa-loving scumbags who still indulge
    in the evils of sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
    soundfonts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!

    Got it????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    There are tons of evil lovers of sample playback MIDI synths,
    emulations, and soundfonts in the entire world.

    Try visiting the newsgroups: comp.music.midi and alt.music.midi

    Majority of those sick f--ks continually hurl insults at Creative
    Music Synth [220] while praising sample playback MIDI synths,
    emulations, and soundfonts. I feel like surrounding those scumslimes
    with superhot flames resulting from localized nuclear fusion.

    On the Creative website -- forums.creative.com -- I am known as
    "CMS220"

    In the above link, is where I take revenge against the following:

    1. Creative Technology for no longer making or upgrading Creative
    Music Synth [220]

    2. Customers who like -- or don't mind -- sample playback MIDI synths,
    emulations, and soundfonts

    3. Customers who dislike -- or don't care for - Creative Music Synth
    [220]

    On the Creative Technology site, I first asked my questions politely
    but no one answered me. I then got frustrated and vented all my anger.
    Now those jerks know how I feel.

    I lost control of my temper and used very bad words. As a result, any
    computer with my home IP address cannot access the Creative forums.
    Also, if I login under the name "CMS220" in any part of the world, the
    Creative site will automatically ban access to its forums from that
    network. They've banned access to the forums from three places already
    because I logged in under CMS220. They've got some auto-ban type of
    feature, it seems.

    It started off like this. I asked in the Creative Technology
    http://forums.creative.com as politely as I could. I waited a couple
    of weeks. No response. I asked again as politely as I could, waited
    another few weeks. Again no answers. I tried on the third and last
    time as politely as I could. AGAIN, no answers!!!

    I then got impatient and aggressive. I started venting my anger in
    those forums. I used bad words. As a result, they've permanently
    banned my IP and I can no longer access their forums. What a buncha
    jerks. Yes, I did get carried away with the foul language but hey, can
    ya blame me?

    So I can no longer sign-in under CMS220. I got a new username "SB16-
    ISA-FM" and logged in from another network outside my house. I started
    venting my anger again using colorful language. One of the Creative
    Technology companymen then sent me a warning note, in which he/she/it
    threatened to contact my ISP and shut-down my internet connection.
    What those fools don't realize is that I can log in under any name
    from any network that I am given access to. It doesn't have to be from
    my house.

    Maybe if Creative Technology weren't made up of such jerks, then I
    wouldn't have started spamming their forums in the 1st place. So its
    not my fault.

    I would like a real Creative Music Synth [220]. Doesn't have to be in
    a sound card. It could be a keyboard, a MIDI box or in any other form.

    Sadly, its not gonna happen because the mechanism by which Creative
    Music Synth [220] is kept classified as top-secret by Creative
    Technology Ltd. CMS220 is no longer made yet the sick @$$ company
    still keeps the working of CMS220 a secret.

    Creative Technology is a stubborn piece of crap. F--k those stingy
    secretive bastards.

    I hate sick sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts.

    I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non-
    emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there.

    FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample
    playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa

    SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its
    all kakaa-like emulation.

    SB16 PCI has the disadvantages of SB16 ISA [e.g. limitation to 16-bit
    resolution] without the advantages [e.g. *real* FM synthesis]. All
    SB16 PCIs should be burned in oxyacetylene flames.

    AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'. I
    hate it though because it is emulation. The Avance sound card has
    'Avance FM synth', but its also a real stinker as it isn't a real
    synth. The evil PCI loves to inflict pain on other types of slot --
    ISA being the unfortunate victim. PCI cards don't contain real FM
    synths.

    Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only
    'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human
    diarrhea kakaa foam. I don't understand why a PCI card cannot contain
    a real FM synth like Creative Music Synth [220]. Is there a technical
    barrier to this?

    I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness,
    warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous
    -- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation.

    Creative Music Synth [220] = SB16 ISA's FM synth = my favorite MIDI
    synth.

    I don't care for other MIDI synths.

    Creative Music Synth [220] is:

    1. Real

    and

    2. Digital

    and

    3. Hardware

    and

    4. Real-time

    All other FM synths are okay. Wavetables are also good. But I don't
    care for them.

    Here are my ratings for *soundcard* MIDI synths in the order from best
    to worst:
    1. Creative Music Synth [220]
    2. All digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth
    [220]
    3. Wavetables, non-FM digital synths, analog [non-digital] synths
    4. Sample playback synths

    Sample playback synths, soundfonts, and emulations are the worst. They
    all STEEEENK!!!!

    Sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts are the worst
    audio equipment ever. They are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy,
    irritating, farty, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying.

    I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so
    warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent.

    The only thing about Creative Technology that I like is their Creative
    Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they are a piece of kakaa.

    Creative Technology is one f--king piece of crap that provides sh--ty
    customer service. Their tech support is so limited.

    Creative Technology used to be such a great company 13 years ago. Now
    there are nothing but stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-humans.

    I've asked them about Creative Music Synth [220] -- through a variety
    of means, including but not limited to phone, fax, and their online
    tech support -- only to be totally-ignored. I asked them about this
    for the past 5 years. Never got a decent answer. In addition, most of
    their online tech support is pre-written garbage.

    Creative Technology also uses such f--ked up sickening disgusting
    sample playback synths in their PCI cards.

    I wish that a gang of persons who support Creative Music Synth [220]
    would attack Creative Technology and force them to make hardware
    versions of Creative Music Synth [220] -- in PCI cards that are
    compatible with PCI slots and Windows XP -- upgraded from 16-bit to 32-
    bit and from 44.1 KHz to 192 KHz. And from there, keep on upgrading!
    When XP and PCI are obsolete then Creative Technology should be forced
    to make even newer hardware versions of CMS220 -- with even wider bit-
    resolutions and higher sample-rates -- that are compatible with the
    newer hardwares and softwares that will exist in that future time.

    If Creative Technology refuses, I hope the CMS220-advocating gang ties
    up the people who make up that company and torturously forces them to
    repeatedly listen to sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
    soundfonts until those Creative personnel are annoyed with burning
    headaches and are deathly desperate for an escape. Only then will the
    people of Creative Technology do the right thing -- make upgraded
    versions of Creative Music Synth [220].

    A rich spoiled-rotten company like Creative deserves to be heinously
    hijacked and forced to do their duties.

    The least Creative Technology Ltd could do is put a *real* 32-bit, 192
    kHz, version of Creative Music Synth [220] in a PCI card. But
    noooooooooooooooooooooo! They are too f--king lazy.

    Its not just Creative Technology that's responsible. Its also the
    fault of self-destructive customers who don't mind paying $$$$$$$$$$$$$
    $$$$$$ for those crappy sample playback synths. F--k those customers
    as well. Masochistic perverts! I don't care if those customers
    destroythemselves. Though, I sure as f--k don't want them destroying
    me! Such customers should eat their own stinky diarrhea kakaa foam. If
    you feed a scum, then you're just as filthy as that scum and I
    sincerely hope you suffer just as much.

    I feel like torching the chips of sample playback synths with
    oxyacetylene flames to distort their audio output.

    Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth.

    Its those sample playback synths that are crap.

    Sadly most MIDI magazines advertise the kakaa-stinky sample playback
    as a good thing often referring to them as 'wavetables'. These sick
    marketers call sample playback synthesis 'realistic sounding'.

    Sample playbacks synths are nothing more than the sound of a stinky
    fart emitted from a human colon.

    I've been looking hard for true FM synths. No luck. Most PCI cards
    have OPL emulation. I hate FM emulation. FM emulation -- much like any
    sample playback synthesis -- is to the ear what human kakaa is to the
    nose.

    I want *real* FM synthesis not some stinky trashy out-of-a-human-
    behind emulation.

    Those stinky-f==king marketers who refer to sample playback synthesis
    as 'wavetables' deserve to be thrown into the sewer and made to eat
    their own crap.

    There is a world of different between sample playback synthesis and
    wavetable synthesis.

    If you still believe the marketer-induced myth that wavetable
    synthesis and sample playback synthesis are the same thing, then
    please educate yourself with the hardcore scientific facts presented
    on the following link:

    http://www.musicdsp.org/files/Wavetable-101.pdf

    Wavetable synthesis is so much better than any kakaa-spitting sample
    playback synth but not nearly as heavenly as *true* FM synthesis. Of
    all the *true* FM synths, Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite.

    If a synth is *not*:

    1. *Real*

    AND

    2. *Digital*

    AND

    3. *Real-time*

    AND

    4. *Hardware*

    then it,
    STEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I try playing Creative Music Synth [220], through my so called
    'karaoke voice canceller' -- which inverts the phase of one stereo
    channel [right or left] and then combines it the other channel --
    which results in anything identical in both the left and right
    channels being removed. I get a mono of what was different in the left
    and right channels.

    When I play Creative Music Synth [220] audio through the voice-
    canceller, it sounds more treble, sharper, brighter, warmer, and
    crisper than when I don't use the voice canceller.

    Due to the above, my MIDI synth dream would be a mono, 32-bit, 192
    kHz, version of Creative Music Synth [220] based on the signals that
    were phased differently in the original CMS220. CMS220 is a stereo FM
    synth who left and right signals are phased differently, this is why I
    get a different sound when I play throught voice-canceller. The
    signals of CMS220 that have the same phase for both L and R have a
    more cheesy sine-wave quality which I don't care for. The signals in
    CMS220 that are phased differently in L and R tend to resemble a
    fresher sawtooth-wave quality which I like. That is why I want my
    version of CMS220 to be based on the sounds that were phased
    differently in the original CMS220. I want my version to be monoaural
    because I want all speakers to give out the same signal.

    Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.


    Thanks,

    Radium
      • Advertising
  2. kitekrazy Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Radium wrote:

    >
    > Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.
    >
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > Radium
    >



    How can I assist you to understand that no one in the cakewalk groups
    really read this and your cooperation would be really appreciated if you
    didn't include cakewalk.coffeehouse, cakewalk.audio in your cross
    posting tirade?
  3. Steve Karl Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    "kitekrazy" <> wrote in message news:MVaCh.64215$...
    > Radium wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.
    >>
    >>
    >> Thanks,
    >>
    >> Radium
    >>

    >
    >
    > How can I assist you to understand that no one in the cakewalk groups really read this and your cooperation would be really
    > appreciated if you didn't include cakewalk.coffeehouse, cakewalk.audio in your cross posting tirade?


    I second that !
  4. Angof Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    "Steve Karl" <> wrote in message
    news:ORbCh.2978$Cr1.2669@trnddc08...
    >
    > "kitekrazy" <> wrote in message
    > news:MVaCh.64215$...
    >> Radium wrote:
    >>
    >>>
    >>> Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>>
    >>> Radium
    >>>

    >>
    >>
    >> How can I assist you to understand that no one in the cakewalk groups
    >> really read this and your cooperation would be really appreciated if you
    >> didn't include cakewalk.coffeehouse, cakewalk.audio in your cross posting
    >> tirade?

    >
    > I second that !
    >
    >
    >


    I read it in another NG and had no idea what he was talking about anyway.

    Angof
  5. Greg McGuirk Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    when I started reading this, two phrases came to mind that caused me to stop
    reading...... "have you ever kissed a girl?" and "dude, get a life!"

    greg

    "Angof" <> wrote in message
    news:45d97c82$0$8716$...
    >
    > "Steve Karl" <> wrote in message
    > news:ORbCh.2978$Cr1.2669@trnddc08...
    >>
    >> "kitekrazy" <> wrote in message
    >> news:MVaCh.64215$...
    >>> Radium wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks,
    >>>>
    >>>> Radium
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> How can I assist you to understand that no one in the cakewalk groups
    >>> really read this and your cooperation would be really appreciated if you
    >>> didn't include cakewalk.coffeehouse, cakewalk.audio in your cross
    >>> posting tirade?

    >>
    >> I second that !
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >
    > I read it in another NG and had no idea what he was talking about anyway.
    >
    > Angof
    >
  6. Major Ursa Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    On Monday 19 February 2007 06:45 Radium wrote:

    > Hi:
    >
    > I know I've brought this extremely-off-topic subject up -- and in
    > other groups -- before but I just can't get over it. I apologize
    > profusely to those who might be annoyed. I hate soundfonts,
    > emulations, and sample playback MIDI synths.


    Get help. Soon.

    Ursa..
  7. Red Meat Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    On 18 Feb 2007 21:45:21 -0800, "Radium" <> wrote:

    >Death to MIDI other than Creative Music Synth [220].




    Creative Music Synth [220] sux.
  8. Radium Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    On Feb 19, 3:31 am, "Greg McGuirk"
    <> wrote:
    > when I started reading this, two phrases came to mind that caused me to stop
    > reading...... "have you ever kissed a girl?" and "dude, get a life!"


    Easy for you to say.

    I still maintain that:

    1. Creative Music Synth [220] is the best *soundcard* MIDI synth

    2. The Crystal soundfont is the worst *soundcard* MIDI synth
  9. Michael Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Radium wrote:

    > On Feb 19, 3:31 am, "Greg McGuirk"
    > <> wrote:
    >> when I started reading this, two phrases came to mind that caused me to
    >> stop reading...... "have you ever kissed a girl?" and "dude, get a life!"

    >
    > Easy for you to say.
    >
    > I still maintain that:
    >
    > 1. Creative Music Synth [220] is the best *soundcard* MIDI synth


    1) Based on what criteria and observations?

    2) What can 16 bit digital faux-FM offer that 24-bit samples can't?

    > 2. The Crystal soundfont is the worst *soundcard* MIDI synth


    1) Have you ever bothered to *listen* to any of the tens of thousands of
    other soundfonts?

    2) Have you ever kissed a girl?
  10. Michael Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Radium wrote:

    > On Feb 19, 3:31 am, "Greg McGuirk"
    > <> wrote:
    >> when I started reading this, two phrases came to mind that caused me to
    >> stop reading...... "have you ever kissed a girl?" and "dude, get a life!"

    >
    > Easy for you to say.
    >
    > I still maintain that:
    >
    > 1. Creative Music Synth [220] is the best *soundcard* MIDI synth
    >
    > 2. The Crystal soundfont is the worst *soundcard* MIDI synth


    Ah. I understand now, after parsing the emphasis on "*soundcard*".

    You want your machine's midi synth to sound (and to be controllable) in only
    the way with which you became most comfortable 20+ years ago, rather than in
    the many hundreds of ways that began there and have evolved in many
    directions, or in the milions of of other ways that have sprung from
    sampling technology's own evolution.

    So.

    Please, then... explain to us all why you're even talking about synths at
    *all*, when it's perfectly obvious that you'd prefer to squirt out a few
    melodically bean-driven farts while plucking a stretched manatee and
    smacking a rock with a flat piece of tree.
  11. Max Arwood Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Please help

    Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it? Or
    should I just block the user? And don't what user cause you already did.
    <g>
    Max Arwood
  12. Michael Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Re: Please help

    Max Arwood wrote:

    > Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it? Or
    > should I just block the user? And don't what user cause you already did.
    > <g>
    > Max Arwood


    Uhhh... you talkin' about this guy, Max? ;-)

    "I feel like burning all sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
    soundfonts along with their consumers, and their companies. Sick pieces of
    stinky thick diarrhea human kakaa foam they are. Vaporize all of those
    involved with nuclear-fusion flames!!!!!"
  13. Michael Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
  14. Max Arwood Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Re: Please help

    What guy? I don't see anyone? As soon as I block "Creative Music Synth
    [220]" I'm not gonna even be able to read this post! <g>
    Max Arwood

    "Michael" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Max Arwood wrote:
    >
    >> Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it? Or
    >> should I just block the user? And don't what user cause you already did.
    >> <g>
    >> Max Arwood

    >
    > Uhhh... you talkin' about this guy, Max? ;-)
    >
    > "I feel like burning all sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
    > soundfonts along with their consumers, and their companies. Sick pieces of
    > stinky thick diarrhea human kakaa foam they are. Vaporize all of those
    > involved with nuclear-fusion flames!!!!!"
    >
    >
  15. Glennbo Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Re: Please help

    In news:dqRCh.48559$ the killer robot
    "Max Arwood" <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship
    cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons...

    > Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it?


    No, you should go to Ebay and find one of those holy grail Soundblaster 16
    ISA cards with an OPL chip. Surely someone makes an ISA to PCI converter.

    --
    Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email
    ________ ____
    / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____
    / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \
    / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ /
    \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo
    Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
    Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms
  16. Glennbo Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Re: Errr... about this "Radium" person...

    In news:p the killer robot
    "Michael" <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship
    cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons...

    > Eeeeewwwwww..... :-\


    If you look for shit, you'll find it!

    --
    Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email
    ________ ____
    / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____
    / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \
    / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ /
    \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo
    Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
    Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms
  17. Max Arwood Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Re: Please help

    I think I will take sampleit and make a multi gig sample set of a SB16. I'm
    sure I will find lots of sales for some samples like that. Ooooh I forgot
    the magic Ebay word.... "Vintage SB16"
    Max Arwood


    "Glennbo" <> wrote in message
    news:Xns98DE56EC7CE5BrownShoesDontMakeIt@207.115.17.102...
    > In news:dqRCh.48559$ the killer robot
    > "Max Arwood" <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship
    > cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons...
    >
    >> Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it?

    >
    > No, you should go to Ebay and find one of those holy grail Soundblaster 16
    > ISA cards with an OPL chip. Surely someone makes an ISA to PCI converter.
    >
    > --
    > Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email
    > ________ ____
    > / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____
    > / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \
    > / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ /
    > \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo
    > Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
    > Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms
  18. Glennbo Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Re: Please help

    In news:pEZCh.65401$ the killer
    robot "Max Arwood" <> grabbed the controls of the
    spaceship cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons...

    > I think I will take sampleit and make a multi gig sample set of a
    > SB16. I'm sure I will find lots of sales for some samples like that.
    > Ooooh I forgot the magic Ebay word.... "Vintage SB16"


    You'll have at least one customer! ;)

    --
    Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email
    ________ ____
    / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____
    / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \
    / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ /
    \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo
    Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
    Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms
  19. Radium Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    On Feb 20, 8:57 pm, "Michael" <> wrote:

    > Radium wrote:


    > > 1. Creative Music Synth [220] is the best *soundcard* MIDI synth


    > 1) Based on what criteria and observations?


    My auditory perception.

    > 2) What can 16 bit digital faux-FM offer that 24-bit samples can't?


    Bright, warm, effervescent, rejuvenating, refreshing, relaxing,
    energizing musical qualities of polysynth pads.

    > > 2. The Crystal soundfont is the worst *soundcard* MIDI synth

    >
    > 1) Have you ever bothered to *listen* to any of the tens of thousands of
    > other soundfonts?


    Um, yes. SB Live MIDI synth -- both A and B. Microsoft GS wavetablke
    SW synth. The list goes on & on. But all soundfonts, emulations, and
    sample playback MIDI synths are to the auditory system what the thick-
    stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-a-human-who-eats-stale-lentils is to the
    olfactory system.
  20. Krid Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    "Radium" <> wrote:

    [long rant why Creative Music Synth [220] allegedly is the only true instrument on
    earth]


    The answers to your problems are:

    1.) http://www.kvraudio.com/
    (lots of softsynths, most of which are a lot better than any of the outdated Creative
    "hardware" synths.)

    2.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIDI
    (for understanding that MIDI is simply a protocol to control digital instruments.
    Of course people still care about MIDI, because it controls hardware snyths as well
    as softsynths and much more.)

    3.) http://www.prozac.com
    ;-)
    .... on the other hand ... maybe you already take too much of it.
    http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/11/28/8361973/index.htm


    Bye,
    Krid.
    --
    www.dirk-music.de
      • Advertising

Share This Page