Soundcard-MIDI is *not* obsolete. It just takes an evil form.

Hi:

I know I've brought this extremely-off-topic subject up -- and in
other groups -- before but I just can't get over it. I apologize
profusely to those who might be annoyed. I hate soundfonts,
emulations, and sample playback MIDI synths.

I request that readers please read this message from began to end
until they fully understand it.

There are many people who still care about MIDI but unfortunately,
these are the sick f--ks who actually like sample playback MIDI
synths, emulations, and soundfonts.

No offense, but you are SOOOOO wrong if you think MIDI is obsolete.
Its just that today's MIDI audio often takes the stinky sample
playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. I feel like burning
all sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts along with
their consumers, and their companies. Sick pieces of stinky thick
diarrhea human kakaa foam they are. Vaporize all of those involved
with nuclear-fusion flames!!!!!

I would like to make some replicable magnetic electronic nanobots that
will search for sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
soundfonts in any part of the world and attach to the digital chips of
sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. These
nanobots should contain magnetic receivers that will extract any
random environmental magnetic audio signals from 2 kHz to 50 kHz
[excluding spikes, square-waves, white noise, brown noise, pink noise
and bass sounds]. The nanobots then amplify those signals to the point
where they would significantly interfere with -- and cause inductive
crosstalk in -- the audio signals in the digital electronic chips of
the sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. This will
cause sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts to be
full of annoying -- and perhaps even frightening -- auditory
disruptions from environmental magnetic interference**.

That way all companies will be forced to abandon all their sample
playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. In addition, all
listeners will be forced to endure the pollution of sample playback
MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts. Alternatively, all companies
will be forced to make *real* synths and the listeners will be forced
to adapt to the excellent audio quality of *real* synths.

For those who miss their stinky human kakaa foam of soundfonts,
emulations, and sample playback synths, well, f--k them!

Voila! No more sample playback MIDI.

I demand that MIDI either use CMS220, or that MIDI audio not be used
at all.

Death to MIDI other than Creative Music Synth [220].

All sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts must be
burned badly. That way those involved in MIDI audio will not have much
choice other than to listen to [or produce]:
1. Creative Music Synth [220]
2. Digital FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220]
3. *Real* wavetables
4. Other digital synchs [excluding emulations, soundfonts, and sample
playback]
5. Analog synths

OR, the other option for those sample-playback-loving, soundfont-
supporting, emulation-advocating f--kheads is to totally give up on
MIDI, get depressed -- due to the absence of sample playback MIDI
synths, emulations, and soundfonts, and jump off a cliff!!!!

I'll see to it that revenge is mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

**Note: The magnetic signals that interfere with those digital chips
should be purely-analog. I just love it when purely-analog magnetic
signals cause significant disruptions in purely-digital chip-based
parts of electronic devices that I don't like. Sample playback MIDI
synths, emulations, and soundfonts are an example of digital
electronic devices that I don't like so I want to victimize them in
this manner -- i.e. via magnetic interferences.

Here is my ratings for soundcard MIDI synths:
1. Creative Music Synth [220]
2. Digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220],
non-FM digital synths [including *real wavetables*; excluding sample
playbacks, soundfonts, and emulations], and analog synths
3. Sample playback synths, soundfonts, and emulations of synths.

Die emulators. Die!

Die soundfonts. Die! Hope they burn in underworld.

Try listening to a sample playback MIDI synth -- such as SoundMax's
MIDI synth -- and compare that to Creative Music Synth [220]. You'll
*definitely* notice the difference.

SoundMax MIDI synth audio is to the ear what stinky thick diarrhea
kakaa foam of humans is to the nose.

The Crystal soundfont is even worse than SoundMax.

Crystal soundfont = the stinkiest, thickest diarrhea kakaa foam of a
human

Creative Music Synth [220], OTOH, is auditory paradise.

I hate FM emulation -- or any audio emulation for that matter.

Emulation = stinky thick diarrhea kakaa foam of humans

F--k emulation.

SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its
all kakaa-like emulation.

AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'. I
hate it though because it is emulation.

Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only
'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human
diarrhea kakaa foam.

I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness,
warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous
-- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation.

Sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts are the worst
audio equipment ever. They are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy,
irritating, farty, hissy, terrifying, foamy, disgusting, and annoying.

I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so
warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent.

So yes. There plenty of those kakaa-loving scumbags who still indulge
in the evils of sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
soundfonts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!

Got it????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

There are tons of evil lovers of sample playback MIDI synths,
emulations, and soundfonts in the entire world.

Try visiting the newsgroups: comp.music.midi and alt.music.midi

Majority of those sick f--ks continually hurl insults at Creative
Music Synth [220] while praising sample playback MIDI synths,
emulations, and soundfonts. I feel like surrounding those scumslimes
with superhot flames resulting from localized nuclear fusion.

On the Creative website -- forums.creative.com -- I am known as
"CMS220"

In the above link, is where I take revenge against the following:

1. Creative Technology for no longer making or upgrading Creative
Music Synth [220]

2. Customers who like -- or don't mind -- sample playback MIDI synths,
emulations, and soundfonts

3. Customers who dislike -- or don't care for - Creative Music Synth
[220]

On the Creative Technology site, I first asked my questions politely
but no one answered me. I then got frustrated and vented all my anger.
Now those jerks know how I feel.

I lost control of my temper and used very bad words. As a result, any
computer with my home IP address cannot access the Creative forums.
Also, if I login under the name "CMS220" in any part of the world, the
Creative site will automatically ban access to its forums from that
network. They've banned access to the forums from three places already
because I logged in under CMS220. They've got some auto-ban type of
feature, it seems.

It started off like this. I asked in the Creative Technology
http://forums.creative.com as politely as I could. I waited a couple
of weeks. No response. I asked again as politely as I could, waited
another few weeks. Again no answers. I tried on the third and last
time as politely as I could. AGAIN, no answers!!!

I then got impatient and aggressive. I started venting my anger in
those forums. I used bad words. As a result, they've permanently
banned my IP and I can no longer access their forums. What a buncha
jerks. Yes, I did get carried away with the foul language but hey, can
ya blame me?

So I can no longer sign-in under CMS220. I got a new username "SB16-
ISA-FM" and logged in from another network outside my house. I started
venting my anger again using colorful language. One of the Creative
Technology companymen then sent me a warning note, in which he/she/it
threatened to contact my ISP and shut-down my internet connection.
What those fools don't realize is that I can log in under any name
from any network that I am given access to. It doesn't have to be from
my house.

Maybe if Creative Technology weren't made up of such jerks, then I
wouldn't have started spamming their forums in the 1st place. So its
not my fault.

I would like a real Creative Music Synth [220]. Doesn't have to be in
a sound card. It could be a keyboard, a MIDI box or in any other form.

Sadly, its not gonna happen because the mechanism by which Creative
Music Synth [220] is kept classified as top-secret by Creative
Technology Ltd. CMS220 is no longer made yet the sick @$$ company
still keeps the working of CMS220 a secret.

Creative Technology is a stubborn piece of crap. F--k those stingy
secretive bastards.

I hate sick sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts.

I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non-
emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there.

FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample
playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa

SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its
all kakaa-like emulation.

SB16 PCI has the disadvantages of SB16 ISA [e.g. limitation to 16-bit
resolution] without the advantages [e.g. *real* FM synthesis]. All
SB16 PCIs should be burned in oxyacetylene flames.

AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'. I
hate it though because it is emulation. The Avance sound card has
'Avance FM synth', but its also a real stinker as it isn't a real
synth. The evil PCI loves to inflict pain on other types of slot --
ISA being the unfortunate victim. PCI cards don't contain real FM
synths.

Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only
'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human
diarrhea kakaa foam. I don't understand why a PCI card cannot contain
a real FM synth like Creative Music Synth [220]. Is there a technical
barrier to this?

I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness,
warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous
-- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation.

Creative Music Synth [220] = SB16 ISA's FM synth = my favorite MIDI
synth.

I don't care for other MIDI synths.

Creative Music Synth [220] is:

1. Real

and

2. Digital

and

3. Hardware

and

4. Real-time

All other FM synths are okay. Wavetables are also good. But I don't
care for them.

Here are my ratings for *soundcard* MIDI synths in the order from best
to worst:
1. Creative Music Synth [220]
2. All digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth
[220]
3. Wavetables, non-FM digital synths, analog [non-digital] synths
4. Sample playback synths

Sample playback synths, soundfonts, and emulations are the worst. They
all STEEEENK!!!!

Sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and soundfonts are the worst
audio equipment ever. They are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy,
irritating, farty, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying.

I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so
warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent.

The only thing about Creative Technology that I like is their Creative
Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they are a piece of kakaa.

Creative Technology is one f--king piece of crap that provides sh--ty
customer service. Their tech support is so limited.

Creative Technology used to be such a great company 13 years ago. Now
there are nothing but stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-humans.

I've asked them about Creative Music Synth [220] -- through a variety
of means, including but not limited to phone, fax, and their online
tech support -- only to be totally-ignored. I asked them about this
for the past 5 years. Never got a decent answer. In addition, most of
their online tech support is pre-written garbage.

Creative Technology also uses such f--ked up sickening disgusting
sample playback synths in their PCI cards.

I wish that a gang of persons who support Creative Music Synth [220]
would attack Creative Technology and force them to make hardware
versions of Creative Music Synth [220] -- in PCI cards that are
compatible with PCI slots and Windows XP -- upgraded from 16-bit to 32-
bit and from 44.1 KHz to 192 KHz. And from there, keep on upgrading!
When XP and PCI are obsolete then Creative Technology should be forced
to make even newer hardware versions of CMS220 -- with even wider bit-
resolutions and higher sample-rates -- that are compatible with the
newer hardwares and softwares that will exist in that future time.

If Creative Technology refuses, I hope the CMS220-advocating gang ties
up the people who make up that company and torturously forces them to
repeatedly listen to sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
soundfonts until those Creative personnel are annoyed with burning
headaches and are deathly desperate for an escape. Only then will the
people of Creative Technology do the right thing -- make upgraded
versions of Creative Music Synth [220].

A rich spoiled-rotten company like Creative deserves to be heinously
hijacked and forced to do their duties.

The least Creative Technology Ltd could do is put a *real* 32-bit, 192
kHz, version of Creative Music Synth [220] in a PCI card. But
noooooooooooooooooooooo! They are too f--king lazy.

Its not just Creative Technology that's responsible. Its also the
fault of self-destructive customers who don't mind paying $$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$ for those crappy sample playback synths. F--k those customers
as well. Masochistic perverts! I don't care if those customers
destroythemselves. Though, I sure as f--k don't want them destroying
me! Such customers should eat their own stinky diarrhea kakaa foam. If
you feed a scum, then you're just as filthy as that scum and I
sincerely hope you suffer just as much.

I feel like torching the chips of sample playback synths with
oxyacetylene flames to distort their audio output.

Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth.

Its those sample playback synths that are crap.

Sadly most MIDI magazines advertise the kakaa-stinky sample playback
as a good thing often referring to them as 'wavetables'. These sick
marketers call sample playback synthesis 'realistic sounding'.

Sample playbacks synths are nothing more than the sound of a stinky
fart emitted from a human colon.

I've been looking hard for true FM synths. No luck. Most PCI cards
have OPL emulation. I hate FM emulation. FM emulation -- much like any
sample playback synthesis -- is to the ear what human kakaa is to the
nose.

I want *real* FM synthesis not some stinky trashy out-of-a-human-
behind emulation.

Those stinky-f==king marketers who refer to sample playback synthesis
as 'wavetables' deserve to be thrown into the sewer and made to eat
their own crap.

There is a world of different between sample playback synthesis and
wavetable synthesis.

If you still believe the marketer-induced myth that wavetable
synthesis and sample playback synthesis are the same thing, then
please educate yourself with the hardcore scientific facts presented
on the following link:

http://www.musicdsp.org/files/Wavetable-101.pdf

Wavetable synthesis is so much better than any kakaa-spitting sample
playback synth but not nearly as heavenly as *true* FM synthesis. Of
all the *true* FM synths, Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite.

If a synth is *not*:

1. *Real*

AND

2. *Digital*

AND

3. *Real-time*

AND

4. *Hardware*

then it,
STEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I try playing Creative Music Synth [220], through my so called
'karaoke voice canceller' -- which inverts the phase of one stereo
channel [right or left] and then combines it the other channel --
which results in anything identical in both the left and right
channels being removed. I get a mono of what was different in the left
and right channels.

When I play Creative Music Synth [220] audio through the voice-
canceller, it sounds more treble, sharper, brighter, warmer, and
crisper than when I don't use the voice canceller.

Due to the above, my MIDI synth dream would be a mono, 32-bit, 192
kHz, version of Creative Music Synth [220] based on the signals that
were phased differently in the original CMS220. CMS220 is a stereo FM
synth who left and right signals are phased differently, this is why I
get a different sound when I play throught voice-canceller. The
signals of CMS220 that have the same phase for both L and R have a
more cheesy sine-wave quality which I don't care for. The signals in
CMS220 that are phased differently in L and R tend to resemble a
fresher sawtooth-wave quality which I like. That is why I want my
version of CMS220 to be based on the sounds that were phased
differently in the original CMS220. I want my version to be monoaural
because I want all speakers to give out the same signal.

Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.


Thanks,

Radium

Radium wrote:

>
> Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Radium
>


How can I assist you to understand that no one in the cakewalk groups
really read this and your cooperation would be really appreciated if you
didn't include cakewalk.coffeehouse, cakewalk.audio in your cross
posting tirade?

"kitekrazy" <> wrote in message news:MVaCh.64215$...
> Radium wrote:
>
>>
>> Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Radium
>>
>
>
> How can I assist you to understand that no one in the cakewalk groups really read this and your cooperation would be really
> appreciated if you didn't include cakewalk.coffeehouse, cakewalk.audio in your cross posting tirade?

I second that !

"Steve Karl" <> wrote in message
news:ORbCh.2978$Cr1.2669@trnddc08...
>
> "kitekrazy" <> wrote in message
> news:MVaCh.64215$...
>> Radium wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Radium
>>>
>>
>>
>> How can I assist you to understand that no one in the cakewalk groups
>> really read this and your cooperation would be really appreciated if you
>> didn't include cakewalk.coffeehouse, cakewalk.audio in your cross posting
>> tirade?
>
> I second that !
>
>
>

I read it in another NG and had no idea what he was talking about anyway.

Angof

when I started reading this, two phrases came to mind that caused me to stop
reading...... "have you ever kissed a girl?" and "dude, get a life!"

greg

"Angof" <> wrote in message
news:45d97c82$0$8716$...
>
> "Steve Karl" <> wrote in message
> news:ORbCh.2978$Cr1.2669@trnddc08...
>>
>> "kitekrazy" <> wrote in message
>> news:MVaCh.64215$...
>>> Radium wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Radium
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> How can I assist you to understand that no one in the cakewalk groups
>>> really read this and your cooperation would be really appreciated if you
>>> didn't include cakewalk.coffeehouse, cakewalk.audio in your cross
>>> posting tirade?
>>
>> I second that !
>>
>>
>>
>
> I read it in another NG and had no idea what he was talking about anyway.
>
> Angof
>

On Monday 19 February 2007 06:45 Radium wrote:

> Hi:
>
> I know I've brought this extremely-off-topic subject up -- and in
> other groups -- before but I just can't get over it. I apologize
> profusely to those who might be annoyed. I hate soundfonts,
> emulations, and sample playback MIDI synths.

Get help. Soon.

Ursa..

On 18 Feb 2007 21:45:21 -0800, "Radium" <> wrote:

>Death to MIDI other than Creative Music Synth [220].



Creative Music Synth [220] sux.

On Feb 19, 3:31 am, "Greg McGuirk"
<> wrote:
> when I started reading this, two phrases came to mind that caused me to stop
> reading...... "have you ever kissed a girl?" and "dude, get a life!"

Easy for you to say.

I still maintain that:

1. Creative Music Synth [220] is the best *soundcard* MIDI synth

2. The Crystal soundfont is the worst *soundcard* MIDI synth

Radium wrote:

> On Feb 19, 3:31 am, "Greg McGuirk"
> <> wrote:
>> when I started reading this, two phrases came to mind that caused me to
>> stop reading...... "have you ever kissed a girl?" and "dude, get a life!"
>
> Easy for you to say.
>
> I still maintain that:
>
> 1. Creative Music Synth [220] is the best *soundcard* MIDI synth

1) Based on what criteria and observations?

2) What can 16 bit digital faux-FM offer that 24-bit samples can't?

> 2. The Crystal soundfont is the worst *soundcard* MIDI synth

1) Have you ever bothered to *listen* to any of the tens of thousands of
other soundfonts?

2) Have you ever kissed a girl?

Radium wrote:

> On Feb 19, 3:31 am, "Greg McGuirk"
> <> wrote:
>> when I started reading this, two phrases came to mind that caused me to
>> stop reading...... "have you ever kissed a girl?" and "dude, get a life!"
>
> Easy for you to say.
>
> I still maintain that:
>
> 1. Creative Music Synth [220] is the best *soundcard* MIDI synth
>
> 2. The Crystal soundfont is the worst *soundcard* MIDI synth

Ah. I understand now, after parsing the emphasis on "*soundcard*".

You want your machine's midi synth to sound (and to be controllable) in only
the way with which you became most comfortable 20+ years ago, rather than in
the many hundreds of ways that began there and have evolved in many
directions, or in the milions of of other ways that have sprung from
sampling technology's own evolution.

So.

Please, then... explain to us all why you're even talking about synths at
*all*, when it's perfectly obvious that you'd prefer to squirt out a few
melodically bean-driven farts while plucking a stretched manatee and
smacking a rock with a flat piece of tree.

Please help

Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it? Or
should I just block the user? And don't what user cause you already did.
<g>
Max Arwood

Re: Please help

Max Arwood wrote:

> Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it? Or
> should I just block the user? And don't what user cause you already did.
> <g>
> Max Arwood

Uhhh... you talkin' about this guy, Max? ;-)

"I feel like burning all sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
soundfonts along with their consumers, and their companies. Sick pieces of
stinky thick diarrhea human kakaa foam they are. Vaporize all of those
involved with nuclear-fusion flames!!!!!"

Errr... about this "Radium" person...

http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=foam human diarrhea&safe=off

Eeeeewwwwww..... :-\

Re: Please help

What guy? I don't see anyone? As soon as I block "Creative Music Synth
[220]" I'm not gonna even be able to read this post! <g>
Max Arwood

"Michael" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Max Arwood wrote:
>
>> Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it? Or
>> should I just block the user? And don't what user cause you already did.
>> <g>
>> Max Arwood
>
> Uhhh... you talkin' about this guy, Max? ;-)
>
> "I feel like burning all sample playback MIDI synths, emulations, and
> soundfonts along with their consumers, and their companies. Sick pieces of
> stinky thick diarrhea human kakaa foam they are. Vaporize all of those
> involved with nuclear-fusion flames!!!!!"
>
>

Re: Please help

In news:dqRCh.48559$ the killer robot
"Max Arwood" <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship
cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons...

> Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it?

No, you should go to Ebay and find one of those holy grail Soundblaster 16
ISA cards with an OPL chip. Surely someone makes an ISA to PCI converter.

--
Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email
________ ____
/ ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____
/ / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \
/ /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ /
\____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo
Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms

Re: Errr... about this "Radium" person...

In news the killer robot
"Michael" <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship
cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons...

> Eeeeewwwwww..... :-\

If you look for shit, you'll find it!

--
Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email
________ ____
/ ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____
/ / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \
/ /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ /
\____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo
Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms

Re: Please help

I think I will take sampleit and make a multi gig sample set of a SB16. I'm
sure I will find lots of sales for some samples like that. Ooooh I forgot
the magic Ebay word.... "Vintage SB16"
Max Arwood


"Glennbo" <> wrote in message
news:Xns98DE56EC7CE5BrownShoesDontMakeIt@207.115.17.102...
> In news:dqRCh.48559$ the killer robot
> "Max Arwood" <> grabbed the controls of the spaceship
> cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons...
>
>> Should I block any messages with "Creative Music Synth [220]" in it?
>
> No, you should go to Ebay and find one of those holy grail Soundblaster 16
> ISA cards with an OPL chip. Surely someone makes an ISA to PCI converter.
>
> --
> Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email
> ________ ____
> / ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____
> / / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \
> / /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ /
> \____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo
> Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
> Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms

Re: Please help

In newsEZCh.65401$ the killer
robot "Max Arwood" <> grabbed the controls of the
spaceship cakewalk.audio and pressed these buttons...

> I think I will take sampleit and make a multi gig sample set of a
> SB16. I'm sure I will find lots of sales for some samples like that.
> Ooooh I forgot the magic Ebay word.... "Vintage SB16"

You'll have at least one customer!

--
Remove YourHeadFromYourAss to Reply by email
________ ____
/ ____/ /__ ____ ____ / __ )____
/ / __/ / _ \/ __ \/ __ \/ __ / __ \
/ /_/ / / __/ / / / / / / /_/ / /_/ /
\____/_/\___/_/ /_/_/ /_/_____/\____/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Glennbo http://www.soundclick.com/glennbo
Non-Linear Sound http://www.soundclick.com/jambits
Hear My Music http://www.soundclick.com/ThePseudonyms

On Feb 20, 8:57 pm, "Michael" <> wrote:

> Radium wrote:

> > 1. Creative Music Synth [220] is the best *soundcard* MIDI synth

> 1) Based on what criteria and observations?

My auditory perception.

> 2) What can 16 bit digital faux-FM offer that 24-bit samples can't?

Bright, warm, effervescent, rejuvenating, refreshing, relaxing,
energizing musical qualities of polysynth pads.

> > 2. The Crystal soundfont is the worst *soundcard* MIDI synth
>
> 1) Have you ever bothered to *listen* to any of the tens of thousands of
> other soundfonts?

Um, yes. SB Live MIDI synth -- both A and B. Microsoft GS wavetablke
SW synth. The list goes on & on. But all soundfonts, emulations, and
sample playback MIDI synths are to the auditory system what the thick-
stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-a-human-who-eats-stale-lentils is to the
olfactory system.

"Radium" <> wrote:

[long rant why Creative Music Synth [220] allegedly is the only true instrument on
earth]


The answers to your problems are:

1.) http://www.kvraudio.com/
(lots of softsynths, most of which are a lot better than any of the outdated Creative
"hardware" synths.)

2.) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIDI
(for understanding that MIDI is simply a protocol to control digital instruments.
Of course people still care about MIDI, because it controls hardware snyths as well
as softsynths and much more.)

3.) http://www.prozac.com
;-)
.... on the other hand ... maybe you already take too much of it.
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/11/28/8361973/index.htm


Bye,
Krid.
--
www.dirk-music.de