I have 2 extra motherboards here are the specs: dual socket 8 board (msi board) w/ 2 pentiumII overdrives 333mhz 256mb ram 2 scsi disks 7200 rpm the other is : single socket 370t(ecs board) w/ celeron 1.4 ghz 192mb ram ata 66 7200 disk I have been using the dual socket board and is pretty smooth with xp or nt4. but i been wondering if a single socket might be better, but then i think about the l2 cache and its 1 meg at333mhz vs 256k at 1400mhz. I am so far only upto 16 tracks. my current gaming machine is a nforce2 board msi version with all the extras including the sound storm apu. proble end up using this after a couple of years. which one the dual or the single celeron?
The single-CPU system is far better. -S "chrisrobin" <> wrote in message news:bonrir$1f7u7g$-berlin.de... > I have 2 extra motherboards here are the specs: > dual socket 8 board (msi board) w/ 2 pentiumII overdrives 333mhz > 256mb ram > 2 scsi disks 7200 rpm > the other is : > single socket 370t(ecs board) w/ celeron 1.4 ghz > 192mb ram > ata 66 7200 disk > I have been using the dual socket board and is pretty smooth with xp or > nt4. but i been wondering if a single socket might be better, but then i > think about the l2 cache and its 1 meg at333mhz vs 256k at 1400mhz. I am so > far only upto 16 tracks. my current gaming machine is a nforce2 board msi > version with all the extras including the sound storm apu. proble end up > using this after a couple of years. which one the dual or the single > celeron? > >