Which Amp is powerful enough? And not too heavy?

Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I play with a loud metal band. My Roland KC550 is more than powerful enough. The problem is not the amp, it’s my back- I can no longer lug the 63lb KC550 around.

I noticed the new Roland amps have different wattage. The KC 400 is 150 watts and only 48 lbs- would that be powerful enough? The KC 200 is 100w and only 33lbs- would that be able to hold its own against drums, bass, and guitar?

Other brands seem to work differently. The Behringer Ultratone is 600 watts but only 40lbs, and the Peavey amps seem to have totally different wattage. I don’t really understand the electronics, wattage etc, so I don’t know how to gauge the power of an amp.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2017
Messages
5,736
Reaction score
3,100
Location
Lancashire, UK.
I share your pain, I also have back issues, its not fun.

Twice a year I go to an Instrument Fair where in the c500 seat area set aside for performance artists there is a single PA system that they all use. The genres of music played arefrom folk, through blues and rock to heavy metal and they all sound great through the system

The PA is a Bose L1 which is modular and as I understand expandable, it consists of a tall column speaker unit of only a few Kg in weight to a Sub Woofer that is c20kg

So do check it out if this seems of interest.

Also check out the Bose f1 system 1000W and 45lbs.

My local keyboard store has a Yamaha Stagepas system setup to use when playing aeyboard. It is quite light at c25lbs per speaker and they sell it as a kit of two speakers plus mixer, the system does sound great even when I play through it, which must be testamount to the quality of the PA, it is certainly not due to my limited keyboard skills.

We also have a Stagepas system at an organisation whose meetings I go to but it is used purely for the spoken word and the system is light, quick and easy to set up and the quality of the sound is excellent. Do check these out if such a system is powerful enough for the venues you play at.

I am struggling to thinkof anything else that is powerful yet light in weight.

eg a 15” Behringer 1500W powered speaker is c56lbs and ai for one wouldnot like to be hauling that from the Van to the stage and so many seem to fallinto this weight range.

Hopefully one of the other members here can also provide advice on a system that can help further damage being inflicted on your back.

Keep rocking.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
1,636
Reaction score
578
There is very little correlation between wattage figures and volume. Three problems:

* different companies don't measure wattage the same way. Is it peak or RMS? Over what frequency range? With what level of distortion?

* even if measured the same way, the same wattage amp can yield a different max volume depending on the efficiency of the speaker it is mated to. 700 watts into a speaker with an efficiency of 87dB/1w would not be as loud as 200 watts into a speaker with an efficiency of 93db/1w. And when you buy a self-contained amplifier/speaker combo, you don't know the efficiency of the speaker. Max SPL is a much more useful spec in this case (though not every company publishes it).

* some systems add up wattages that go to different components, which can be deceiving. Like the original QSC K series, which they said was 1000 watts continuous, but was based on an amp that sent 500 watts to the low frequency driver and 500 watts to the high frequency driver (presumably because the kind of amp they used was cost-effectively implemented as a matched pair, i.e. a stereo amp that was 500 was per channel). What's deceiving about this is that high frequency drivers don't require nearly as much power. So if 500 watts was going to the woofer, the tweeter would have needed under 100 watts to keep up. So the extra 400 watts available to the high frequency driver was unnecessary. That 1000- watt system (500 w LF, 500 w HF) would play no louder than if it had been a 600 watt system (500 w LF, 100 w HF).

So look more at the SPL specs if you can find them, rather than the wattage specs (and even more so if you are comparing across different brands).

As for weight, one reason you see weight/power ratios that are so different is that different kinds of amps can be heavier or lighter when producing the same power (Class D amps are lighter). Other things that affect the weight is that cabinet materials can vary a lot, and also the weight of the magnets on the speakers (neodymium is lighter for comparable performance, but is more expensive).
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2012
Messages
1,565
Reaction score
737
I ditched my keyboard amp as an output source several years ago. By today's standards keyboard amps are considered lo-fi. they're heavy and average sounding. in contrast I now use a PPA (Powered PA) speaker. Mine is an EV ELX112P. the SPL (as anotherscott mentioned above) is 132dB/1W. My keyboard amp was 81 pounds, my PPA is 37; My Keyboard amp puts out 150 watts, the PPA puts out 1000 watts; the keyboard amps SPL is unknown (unpublished) and my PPA is 132db/1W. Side by side I can tell you that my PPA is much louder than my keyboard amp, the PPA's sound is much clearer. In contrast the Keyboard amp sounds as though a blanket has been thrown over the speakers. There are two advantages that the keyboard amp has over the PPA: 1) the mixer is built in, i.e. it has 3 inputs with bass, mid and treble controls on each channel and channel reverb, The PPA has two inputs but no EQ settings and no reverb, so I solution this by first running the outputs of my keyboards through a mixer, then output the mixer to the PPA. so there is an extra piece of equipment to account for. 2) Because the keyboard amp is "lo-fi" an organ emulation sounds better through it. Hammond organs using leslie speakers as their output source and leslie speakers are considered lo-fi, so the match is better. Pianos need a hi-fi source to sound their best, so an acoustic piano emulation sounds far better through a PPA than through the keyboard amp. Overall though the PPA sounds way better, is lighter and the EV's are not that much money (relatively speaking). I would look at this route before investing in another "keyboard amp". Here are some to consider:



 
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
911
Reaction score
276
Location
South Carolina
Both and Delaware Dave have pointed you in the right direction. I recently upgraded from a Motion Sound amp to a pair of Yamaha DXR10 powered pa speakers. The PPA speakers are 131 max SPL and can get very loud while maintaining clarity. These DXR10's are Yamaha "FRFR" units (Full Range Flat Response) which are akin to a studio monitor type sound reproduction. One DXR10 weighs 32 pounds. Don
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2018
Messages
209
Reaction score
67
Me too. im running a Yamaha DSR12 - more bottom end than the 10s. Its heavier than the DXR but its the next range up (more power, larger tweeter etc).
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2018
Messages
16
Reaction score
4
Location
New Zealand
I just bought an HK nano system. Two small powered satelite speakers about 4” cubed that run off the base unit housing a 10” sub. The satelights are stored in the base unit for easy carrying. HK rate this unit at 750 watts and suitable for a crowd of up to 80 people. It’s very loud and easy to carry. You can mount the two satelites on mic stands or use HKs own which come in their own cute carrying bag with 6 metre cables. HK also make a mono stand that screws into the base with two satelites fixed directly on top with the audio cable running up inside. These are amazing units that are not expensive and sound great. I’ve used mine as a pa with four vocalists and a keyboard running through it. Highly recommended. HKAudio.com
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
14,046
Messages
86,666
Members
13,149
Latest member
sbmusichelp

Latest Threads

Top